Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells01:19

Clinical Applications of Epidermal Stem Cells

2.7K
Epidermal stem cells (EpiSCs) are mainly located at the basal layer of the epidermis. These cells repair minor injuries of the skin and replace dead skin cells. However, EpiSCs’ cannot heal severe wounds such as major burns or those from diabetes or hereditary disorders. In such cases, culturing the epidermal stem cells from the patient is possible and has yielded successful treatment options, such as laboratory-grown skin grafts. These grafts are synthesized using a patient’s own...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antimicrobial susceptibility, molecular characterization and multilocus sequence typing of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with subclinical mastitis in buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) in Haryana, India.

Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]·2026
Same author

Balancing Relief and Risk: Managing Chronic Low Back Pain in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.

Southern medical journal·2026
Same author

Assessment of Total Delays and Their Associated Factors among Breast, Cervical, and Head and Neck Cancers in Northwestern India: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP·2026
Same author

Optimizing the timing of autologous skin cell suspension after enzymatic debridement of porcine burns: Evaluation with digital image speckle correlation.

JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health·2026
Same author

A Qualitative Study of the Lived Experiences and Needs of Parent Caregivers of People With Cystic Fibrosis.

Pediatric pulmonology·2026
Same author

Understanding antimicrobial resistance phenotype in Indian clinical isolates through genomic lens.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation
09:30

Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation

Published on: March 4, 2016

21.6K

Autologous Skin Grafts, versus Tissue-engineered Skin Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sara Kianian1, Kelley Zhao1, Jasleen Kaur2

  • 1From the Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, N.Y.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open
|June 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Autologous skin grafts are limited, but acellular and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs show comparable outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm their clinical applicability and efficacy in wound healing.

More Related Videos

A Murine Model of a Burn Wound Reconstructed with an Allogeneic Skin Graft
12:18

A Murine Model of a Burn Wound Reconstructed with an Allogeneic Skin Graft

Published on: August 8, 2020

10.1K
Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents
09:04

Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents

Published on: February 12, 2021

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation
09:30

Tissue Characterization after a New Disaggregation Method for Skin Micro-Grafts Generation

Published on: March 4, 2016

21.6K
A Murine Model of a Burn Wound Reconstructed with an Allogeneic Skin Graft
12:18

A Murine Model of a Burn Wound Reconstructed with an Allogeneic Skin Graft

Published on: August 8, 2020

10.1K
Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents
09:04

Generation of Self-assembled Vascularized Human Skin Equivalents

Published on: February 12, 2021

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Wound Healing Research

Background:

  • Autologous skin grafts are the standard for wound reconstruction but face availability limitations.
  • Tissue-engineered skin constructs, including acellular and cellular types, offer potential solutions.
  • This study systematically reviews and compares these constructs against traditional grafts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of acellular and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs with autologous skin grafts.
  • To evaluate graft incorporation, failure rates, and wound healing.
  • To assess the clinical applicability and efficacy of tissue-engineered skin constructs.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases.
  • Included 66 articles with 4076 patients, excluding non-English or non-full-text articles, case reports, reviews, and in vitro/in vivo studies.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in graft failure rates or reepithelialization were found between split-thickness skin grafts alone and those co-grafted with acellular tissue-engineered constructs.
  • Similar Vancouver Scar Scale scores were observed for both groups.
  • Preliminary findings suggest cellular tissue-engineered constructs show promise, with no statistically significant differences in reepithelialization or failure rates compared to split-thickness skin grafts.

Conclusions:

  • This review indicates comparable functional and wound healing outcomes between split-thickness skin grafts and acellular tissue-engineered skin constructs.
  • Cellular tissue-engineered constructs show promising preliminary results.
  • Heterogeneity in study data limits clinical applicability, necessitating further Level 1 evidence for safety and efficacy determination.