Effectiveness of adhesive containing MDPB: A practice-based clinical trial

This prospective practice-based trial assessed the longevity of composite restorations made with an adhesive containing an antibacterial monomer compared to a conventional adhesive.

9 general practices in the Netherlands were provided with two composite resin adhesives, each for a period of 9 months. Adhesive P contained the quaternary ammonium salt MDPB, and Adhesive S was a control. Patient's age and caries risk, as well as tooth type/number, reason for restoration placement, used restorative material and adhesive, and restored surfaces were recorded. All interventions carried out on these teeth in the 6 years after restoration were extracted from the electronic patient records, along with their date, type, reason, and surfaces. Two dependent variables were defined: general failure, and failure due to secondary caries. All data handling and multiple Cox regression analysis were carried out in R 4.0.5.

11 dentists from 7 practices made 10,151 restorations over a period of two years in 5102 patients. 4591 restorations were made with adhesive P, whereas 5560 were made with adhesive S. The observation period was up to 6.29 years, median observation time was 3.74 years. Cox regression showed no significant difference between the two adhesive materials when corrected for age, tooth type and caries risk, for general failure nor failure due to caries.

No difference in restoration survival could be shown between composite restorations made using an adhesive containing MDPB and control. Restorations made with the adhesive containing MDPB also did not fail more or less frequently due to secondary caries. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov with identifier NCT05118100.