Therapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in resource-poor geospaces

Moisés M Gallardo-Pérez1,2, Robert Peter Gale3, Oscar A Reyes-Cisneros1,4

  • 1Centro de Hematología y Medicina Interna, Clínica Ruiz, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.

PubMed

Insights

This study adapted a leukemia treatment protocol for outpatient care in low-resource settings, achieving good outcomes and significantly reducing costs for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Hematology
  • Global Health

Background:

  • Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in resource-limited areas presents significant challenges in balancing safety, efficacy, availability, and cost.
  • Existing protocols often require extensive hospital infrastructure, limiting accessibility in low-income regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To adapt the St. Jude Total XI protocol for outpatient delivery in resource-limited settings for children with ALL.
  • To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of this modified outpatient protocol.

Main Methods:

  • Modified the St. Jude Total XI protocol for outpatient care, including weekly chemotherapy, delayed intrathecal treatment, prophylactic antibiotics/antimycotics, generic drugs, and no CNS radiation.
  • Collected data from 104 children aged ≤12 years treated in an outpatient setting.
  • Analyzed hematological remission, event-free survival (EFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and treatment costs.

Main Results:

  • 88 out of 104 children achieved complete remission.
  • Median EFS was 87 months overall, with variations based on risk stratification.
  • The 5-year CIR was 28%, and survival exceeded 5 years for most patients.
  • Treatment costs were substantially lower ($28,500 USD) compared to high-income countries (~$150,000 USD).

Conclusions:

  • An outpatient modification of the St. Jude Total XI protocol provides good outcomes for childhood ALL in resource-limited settings.
  • This adapted protocol demonstrates significant cost savings with manageable hospitalizations and adverse events.
  • The model is applicable to other resource-poor regions facing similar challenges in pediatric cancer treatment.