Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic analysis of key players in PI3K signaling cascade of colorectal carcinoma.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Visual attention in peripersonal space is dependent on differential modulation of V2 feature selectivity by hand vision and proprioception.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Study protocol and pilot study results for a clinical intervention trial of PKU carriers and non-carriers: the Phe for Me trial.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2026
Same author

ODDM: Integration of SMOTE Tomek with Deep Learning on Imbalanced Color Fundus Images for Classification of Several Ocular Diseases.

Journal of imaging·2025
Same author

Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Identifying a distractor produces object-based inhibition in an allocentric reference frame for saccade planning.

Scientific reports·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.1K

Motion distractors perturb saccade programming later in time than static distractors.

Devin H Kehoe1,2,3,4, Lukas Schießer5, Hassaan Malik6

  • 1Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, M3J 1P3, Canada.

Current Research in Neurobiology
|July 3, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Visual motion distractors require additional processing time before influencing eye movements, impacting saccadic trajectories. This processing delay affects saccadic reaction time and trajectory bias magnitude.

Keywords:
Behavioral chronometryEye movementsSaccade averagingSaccade curvatureSensorimotor processingTarget selection

More Related Videos

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.5K
Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

45.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

7.1K
Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
05:44

Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function

Published on: July 14, 2016

7.5K
Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
09:03

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism

Published on: March 27, 2012

45.7K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Oculomotor control
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • The precise mechanisms by which visual features influence oculomotor control remain incompletely understood.
  • Oculomotor visual activation latency offers clues into antecedent featural processing.
  • Understanding visual distractor processing is crucial for deciphering oculomotor vector reweighting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the time course of oculomotor processing for static and motion visual distractors.
  • To determine how distractor characteristics (motion direction, speed) affect saccadic behavior.
  • To examine the relationship between distractor processing time, saccadic reaction time, and saccade amplitude.

Main Methods:

  • Continuous measurement of human saccadic behavioral metrics.
  • Comparison of oculomotor processing time for static and motion distractors.
  • Analysis of saccade trajectory biasing as a function of time after distractor onset.

Main Results:

  • Both static and motion distractors elicited curved saccades and shifted endpoints around 25 ms.
  • Motion distractors showed a 10 ms later saccade trajectory biasing effect compared to static distractors (after 50 ms).
  • Shorter saccadic reaction times correlated with shorter distractor processing time latencies for biased saccade trajectories.

Conclusions:

  • Motion stimuli undergo additional processing before influencing the oculomotor system, indicated by delayed saccade trajectory biasing.
  • Shorter saccadic reaction times and larger saccadic amplitudes are associated with greater saccade trajectory biases.
  • These findings shed light on the temporal dynamics of visual-oculomotor integration and distractor interference.