Unveiling the Burden of Miscoding and Misclassification in Stroke Mortality: Analysis of Multiple Cause-of-Death Data

Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado1, Héctor Gómez-Dantés2, Vanessa De la Cruz-Góngora3

  • 1School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.

Neuroepidemiology
|July 3, 2023
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Stroke deaths in Mexico are underreported due to significant miscoding and misclassification on death certificates. Improving death codification is crucial to accurately reflect the true burden of cerebrovascular diseases.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Risk factors for cerebrovascular diseases are rising in Mexico.
  • Stroke mortality rates have stagnated since 2010, despite earlier declines.
  • Inaccurate death certification practices may obscure the true stroke burden.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the extent of miscoding and misclassification in stroke deaths in Mexico.
  • To determine the impact of these errors on reported stroke mortality rates.
  • To highlight the need for improved death certification and cause-of-death classification.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 4,262,666 death certificates in Mexico (2009-2015).
  • Calculation of age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) for stroke as underlying and multiple causes.
  • Comparison of ASMR under three misclassification scenarios (current, moderate, high).

Main Results:

  • Significant underreporting of stroke burden due to miscoding and misclassification.
  • Nearly 60% of stroke deaths are coded as unspecified.
  • Stroke ASMR could increase by 39.9%-52.9% under moderate to high misclassification scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Miscoding and misclassification lead to a substantial underestimation of stroke burden in Mexico.
  • Stroke deaths are frequently underreported when comorbidities like diabetes are present.
  • Enhanced death codification procedures are essential for accurate public health surveillance.

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
191
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
425
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
369
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
121
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
227