Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals

Prediction Intervals

The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

Confidence Intervals

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Heart failure and renal outcomes with angiotensin receptor blockers compared with calcium channel blockers in patients with chronic kidney disease: a target trial emulation.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2026

Same author

Effect of home visiting support on maternal psychosocial needs and postnatal depression: emulating a target trial.

BMJ mental health·2026

Same author

Risk of urinary tract infection with SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and type 2 diabetes: A target trial emulation using a Japanese hospital-based claims database.

Journal of diabetes investigation·2026

Same author

Public acceptance and expectations for Lecanemab: Insights from a Smallest Worthwhile Difference study.

Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences·2026

Same author

Influence Analyses of "Designs" for Evaluating Inconsistency in Network Meta-Analysis.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Smartphone CBT engagement and depressive symptoms: secondary analysis of the RESiLIENT trial using a time-varying exposure approach.

Psychological medicine·2026

Same journal

Doubly robust augmented weighting estimators for the analysis of externally controlled single-arm trials and unanchored indirect treatment comparisons.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

Prompt engineering of large language models for paper screening in medical meta-analyses and systematic reviews: A prospective comparative study - CORRIGENDUM.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

Evaluating the accuracy and speed of eight deduplication tools: A comparative study.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

A comparison of preprint search aggregators: comprehensive identification of preprints in the information retrieval stage of evidence syntheses.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

Meta-research on key metrics of preregistered scoping reviews.

Research synthesis methods·2026

Same journal

Facilitators and barriers to engaging patient partners in knowledge syntheses: A stage-based approach.

Research synthesis methods·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Published on: February 12, 2015

Improved methods to construct prediction intervals for network meta-analysis.

Hisashi Noma¹, Yasuyuki Hamura², Shonosuke Sugasawa³

¹Department of Data Science, The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan.

Research Synthesis Methods

|July 3, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

New methods improve prediction intervals in network meta-analysis for better treatment effect assessment. These bootstrap and Kenward-Roger-type adjustments offer more accurate uncertainty evaluation than standard t-approximation methods.

Keywords:

Kenward-Roger-type adjustment bootstrap higher-order approximation network meta-analysis prediction interval

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke

Published on: February 12, 2015

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Evidence-based medicine
Comparative effectiveness research

Background:

Network meta-analysis (NMA) is crucial for comparing multiple treatments.
Prediction intervals in NMA assess treatment effect uncertainty and study heterogeneity.
Current t-distribution approximation methods for prediction intervals may underestimate uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the validity of standard t-approximation methods for NMA prediction intervals.
To develop and validate novel methods for constructing more accurate NMA prediction intervals.

Main Methods:

Simulation studies were conducted to assess prediction interval methods.
Two new methods were developed: bootstrap and Kenward-Roger-type adjustment.
An R package, PINMA, was created to implement the proposed methods.

Main Results:

The standard t-approximation method's validity was found to be violated in realistic NMA scenarios.
The proposed bootstrap and Kenward-Roger-type methods demonstrated improved coverage performance.
The new methods generally yielded wider prediction intervals compared to the t-approximation.

Conclusions:

Existing t-approximation methods for NMA prediction intervals can be inaccurate.
Bootstrap and Kenward-Roger-type adjustments provide more reliable uncertainty assessment in NMA.
The PINMA R package facilitates the application of these improved methods.