Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

65
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
65
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Choosing Between z and t Distribution01:25

Choosing Between z and t Distribution

2.8K
The z and the Student t distribution estimate the population mean using the sample mean and standard deviation. However, to decide which distribution to use for a calculation, one needs to determine the sample size, the nature of the distribution, and whether the population standard deviation is known. If the population standard deviation is known and the population is normally distributed, or if the sample size is greater than 30, the z distribution is preferred. The Student t distribution is...
2.8K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

247
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
247
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.2K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Coping in Young Breast Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Analysis.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Subgroup Analysis of Interval-censored Failure Time Data With Application to Alzheimer's Disease.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Transfer learning estimation of the accelerated failure time model based on high-dimensional data.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same author

Interpretable Deep Regression Models With Interval-Censored Failure Time Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Ultra-broadband wireless rectification and frequency mixing via the nonlinear Hall effect in TaIrTe<sub>4</sub>.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Variable selection for mixed panel count data under the proportional mean model.

Lei Ge1, Baosheng Liang2, Tao Hu3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new penalized likelihood method for variable selection in event history studies with mixed panel count data. The method effectively identifies risk factors in complex medical research scenarios.

Keywords:
Expectation–maximization algorithmmedical non-adherencemixed panel count dataproportional mean modelvariable selection

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Informatics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Mixed panel count data, common in medical research, present unique challenges for event history analysis.
  • Existing variable selection procedures are insufficient for these complex data types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel penalized likelihood variable selection procedure for event history studies with mixed panel count data.
  • To develop an efficient implementation using an expectation-maximization algorithm with coordinate descent.
  • To validate the method's performance and theoretical properties.

Main Methods:

  • A penalized likelihood approach for variable selection.
  • An expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm integrated with coordinate descent for parameter estimation.
  • Theoretical establishment of the oracle property for the proposed method.
  • Simulation studies to assess practical performance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed penalized likelihood method demonstrates effectiveness in variable selection for mixed panel count data.
  • Simulation results confirm the method's robust performance in practical settings.
  • The oracle property of the method is theoretically proven.

Conclusions:

  • The developed penalized likelihood method offers a reliable approach for variable selection in complex event history studies.
  • The method was successfully applied to identify risk factors for medical non-adherence in a clinical study.
  • This work provides a valuable tool for analyzing mixed panel count data in medical research.