Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
The Trauma Activation Review Committee: Response to Undertriage During a Period of Rapid Growth at a Level II Trauma
Amanda Briese1, Lindsey Register1, Terri DeWees1
1Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Abstract:
Trauma triage criteria are constantly being refined for improved identification of severely injured patients. When errors occur, they should be tracked, and triage criteria adjusted to minimize these events. Two time periods of trauma registry data at a single rural level II trauma center were retrospectively compared to evaluate demographics, injuries, and outcomes to identify triage errors. In 300 activated trauma patients during 2011, overtriage was 23% and undertriage was 3.7%. In 1035 activated trauma patients during 2019, overtriage was 20.5% and undertriage was 2.2%. Mortality decreased over time overall. In 2019, Trauma I patients were older, spent more time on the ventilator, and in the ICU (all P < .001). Trauma II patients were also older, had lower ISS, hospital days, and ventilator days (all P < .001). During rapid growth, evaluation of overtriage and undertriage can provide useful feedback for hospital staff to refine triage choices and improve patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:

