Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025
Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
High-throughput screening of spin states for transition metal complexes with spin-polarized extended tight-binding
Hagen Neugebauer1, Benedikt Bädorf1, Sebastian Ehlert2
1Mulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract:
The semiempirical GFNn-xTB ( ) tight-binding methods are extended with a spin-dependent energy term (spin-polarization), enabling the fast and efficient screening of different spin states for transition metal complexes. While GFNn-xTB methods inherently can not differentiate properly between high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states, this shortcoming is corrected with the presented methods termed spGFNn-xTB. The performance of spGFNn-xTB methods for spin state energy splittings is evaluated on a newly compiled benchmark set of 90 complexes (27 HS and 63 LS complexes) containing 3d, 4d, and 5d transition metals (termed TM90S) employing DFT references at the TPSSh-D4/def2-QZVPP level of theory. The challenging TM90S set contains complexes with charges between 4 and +3, spin multiplicities between 1 and 6, and spin-splitting energies that range from 47.8 to 146.6 kcal/mol with a mean average of 32.2 kcal/mol. On this set the (sp)GFNn-xTB methods, the PM6-D3H4 method, and the PM7 method are evaluated with spGFN1-xTB yielding the lowest MAD of 19.6 kcal/mol followed by spGFN2-xTB with 24.8 kcal/mol. While for the 4d and 5d subsets small or no improvements are observed with spin-polarization, large improvements are obtained for the 3d subset with spGFN1-xTB yielding the smallest MAD of 14.2 kcal/mol followed by spGFN2-xTB with 17.9 kcal/mol and PM6-D3H4 with 28.4 kcal/mol. The correct sign of the spin state splittings is obtained with spGFN2-xTB in 89% of all cases closely followed by spGFN1-xTB with 88%. On the full set, a pure semiempirical vertical spGFN2-xTB//GFN2-xTB-based workflow for screening purposes yields a slightly better MAD of 22.2 kcal/mol due to error compensation, while being qualitative correct for one additional case. In combination with their low computational cost (scanning spin states in seconds), the spGFNn-xTB methods represent robust tools for pre-screening steps of spin state calculations and high-throughput workflows.
More Related Videos
09:00Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
11:44Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
Published on: November 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
03:02Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
02:42Valence Bond Theory
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
01:03Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Overview
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...