Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A Biomimetic Model for Liver Cancer to Study Tumor-Stroma Interactions in a 3D Environment with Tunable Bio-Physical Properties
Published on: August 7, 2020
Liver Cancer Vascularity Driven by Extracellular Matrix Stiffness: Implications for Imaging Research
Ryosuke Taiji1, Andrea C Cortes, Ana Maria Zaske
1From the Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX (R.T., A.C.C., M.W., C.D., R.A.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan (R.T., T.T., H.N.); Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, UT Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX (A.M.Z.); Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany (G.C.); and Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (C.B.P.).
Tumor stiffness impacts drug delivery by altering vasculature. Softer tumors show richer blood vessels and greater contrast enhancement on imaging, unlike stiffer tumors with scant vasculature.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Extracellular matrix stiffness impedes drug delivery by disrupting tumor vasculature.
- Tumor stiffness influences vascular phenotypes, detectable via cross-sectional imaging.
- Contrast-enhanced imaging can reveal the relationship between liver tumor stiffness and vascularity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To correlate extracellular matrix stiffness with imaging features from dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT) and ultrasound (DCE-US).
- To investigate two rat hepatocellular carcinoma models with varying stiffness and vascular characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated tumor stiffness using 2D shear wave elastography and atomic force microscopy.
- Assessed tumor perfusion with DCE-US and DCE-CT.
- Analyzed tumor necrosis and CD34+ blood vessel characteristics (percentage, distribution, thickness).
Main Results:
- Distinct stiffness signatures and vascular phenotypes were observed between the Buffalo-McA-RH7777 and SD-N1S1 models.
- SD-N1S1 tumors were stiffer with scant vasculature; Buffalo-McA-RH7777 tumors were softer with richer, peripherally distributed vasculature.
- Softer tumors (Buffalo-McA-RH7777) exhibited significantly greater contrast enhancement on DCE-US and DCE-CT.
Conclusions:
- Tumor stiffness signatures correlate with distinct vascular phenotypes.
- 2D shear wave elastography and DCE-US effectively characterized stromal patterns and perfusion parameters.
- Imaging revealed significantly greater contrast enhancement in softer tumors, suggesting implications for drug delivery.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
The Tumor Microenvironment
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions

