Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality traits explain levels of norm compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Therapeutic approaches for functional Globus Pharyngeus: A systematic review of studies from 2000 to 2025.

General hospital psychiatry·2026
Same author

Embodied language and early motor restriction: evidence from children with obstetric brachial plexus palsy and arthrogryposis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

General and Specific Facets of Anxiety: Psychometric Analysis and Impact on Cognitive Performance.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The Role of Set Size and Attention in Face Ensemble Processing.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Validation of novel naturalistic limb movement stimuli for studying biological motion perception in adults.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Neurochronometry of choice-induced preference changes: when do preferences actually change?

Alina Davydova1, Julia Sheronova1, Vladimir Kosonogov1

  • 1Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|July 5, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive dissonance causes preference changes after choices. Online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is crucial for understanding the timing of these choice-induced preference changes (CIPC) and the spreading of alternatives (SoA) effect.

Keywords:
choice-induced preference changecognitive dissonancedecision-makingneurochronometryrTMSspreading of alternatives

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

772
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

772
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Cognitive dissonance theory explains how discrepancies between actions and preferences lead to preference revaluation.
  • The spreading of alternatives (SoA) phenomenon describes increased preference for chosen options and decreased preference for rejected ones, a process termed choice-induced preference change (CIPC).
  • While neuroimaging has identified brain regions involved in cognitive dissonance, the precise timing of CIPC mechanisms remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neurochronometry of cognitive mechanisms underlying choice-induced preference change (CIPC).
  • To determine the temporal dynamics of the spreading of alternatives (SoA) effect in relation to choice onset.
  • To propose online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a method to resolve debates on CIPC timing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of previous neuroimaging findings on cognitive dissonance, conflict monitoring, cognitive control, and CIPC.
  • Proposal of online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols to investigate CIPC neurochronometry.
  • Emphasis on TMS's ability to modulate neural activity and establish causal relationships with high temporal and spatial resolution.

Main Results:

  • The exact time point at which attitudes begin to revise relative to option presentation is unclear.
  • Online TMS allows for tracking attitude change by varying stimulation timing relative to stimuli.
  • Previous studies provide a foundation for applying online TMS to CIPC research.

Conclusions:

  • The temporal dynamics of the spreading of alternatives (SoA) effect require further investigation.
  • Online TMS is critical for elucidating the neurochronometry of choice-induced preference change (CIPC).
  • This approach can resolve debates regarding whether CIPC occurs during, immediately after, or later than the choice process.