Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Stroke risk in radial versus femoral approach in coronary intervention: an updated systematic review and
Aditya M Desai1, Darshi Desai1, Arnold Gan1
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside.
Insights
Transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) approaches for cardiac catheterization (CC) have similar stroke risks. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant difference in stroke outcomes between TR and TF access in over a million patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Neurology
Background:
- Peri-cardiac catheterization (CC) stroke poses significant risks, yet comparative stroke risk between transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) approaches remains unclear.
- Understanding these risks is crucial for optimizing patient safety and procedural choices in CC.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed from 1980 to June 2022.
- Included were randomized trials and observational studies comparing radial versus femoral access for CC or intervention, focusing on reported stroke events.
- A random-effects model was employed for data analysis.
Key Points:
- Analysis of 41 pooled studies (1,112,136 patients) and 18 randomized-controlled trials (45,844 patients) revealed no statistically significant difference in stroke outcomes between TR and TF approaches.
- Odds ratio for stroke between TR and TF was 0.71 (95% CI 0.48-1.06).
- Meta-regression analysis also showed no significance in stroke outcomes related to procedural duration between the two access sites.
Conclusions:
- The study concludes that there is no significant difference in stroke outcomes when comparing the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach for cardiac catheterization.
- These findings suggest that procedural choice between TR and TF access may not significantly impact stroke risk.
Aim:
Peri-cardiac catheterization (CC) stroke is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Little is known about any potential difference in stroke risk between transradial (TR) and transfemoral (TF) approaches. We explored this question through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from 1980 to June 2022. Randomized trials and observational studies comparing radial versus femoral access CC or intervention that reported stroke events were included. A random-effects model was used for analysis.
Results:
The total population in our 41 pooled studies comprised 1 112 136 patients - average age 65 years, women averaging 27% in TR and 31% in TF approaches. Primary analysis of 18 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that included a total of 45 844 patients showed that there was no statistical significance in stroke outcomes between the TR approach and the TF approach [odds ratio (OR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.06, P -value = 0.013, I2 = 47.7%]. Furthermore, meta-regression analysis of RCTs including procedural duration between those two access sites showed no significance in stroke outcomes (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.86-1.34, P -value = 0.921, I2 = 0.0%).
Conclusions:
There was no significant difference in stroke outcomes between the TR approach and the TF approach.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management