Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Incremental Utility of First-Pass Perfusion CMR for Prognostic Risk Stratification of Cancer-Associated Cardiac
Angel T Chan1, Tania Ruiz Maya2, Christine Park3
1Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) enhances diagnosis of cardiac metastasis (CMET) and cardiac thrombus (CTHR). For CMET patients, reduced lesion vascularity on perfusion CMR indicates higher mortality risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) differentiates cardiac metastasis (CMET) from cardiac thrombus (CTHR) based on vascularity.
- The diagnostic and prognostic utility of perfusion CMR for cardiac masses (CMASS) remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of perfusion CMR for cardiac masses (CMASS).
- To determine if perfusion CMR offers utility beyond differentiating CMET from CTHR.
Main Methods:
- Adult cancer patients with CMASS on CMR were analyzed.
- Cardiac metastasis (CMET) and cardiac thrombus (CTHR) were identified using LGE-CMR.
- First-pass perfusion CMR assessed CMASS vascularity via contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and contrast uptake rate (CUR); all-cause mortality was tracked.
Main Results:
- Perfusion CMR parameters (CER, CUR) were significantly higher in CMET compared to CTHR (P < 0.001).
- CUR demonstrated superior performance (AUC: 0.89-0.93) over CER (AUC: 0.66-0.72) for differentiating CMET and CTHR.
- Patients with CMET showed higher mortality (HR: 1.42-1.52) compared to controls, with increased risk correlating to lower lesion vascularity (hypoperfusion) on perfusion CMR.
Conclusions:
- Perfusion CMR provides prognostic information that complements LGE-CMR findings for cardiac masses.
- In cancer patients with CMET, increased mortality is associated with greater lesion hypoperfusion, as evidenced by perfusion CMR.

