Complications of the Superior Eyelid Endoscopic Transorbital Approach to the Skull Base: Preliminary Experience With

Alberto Di Somma1, Giulia Guizzardi, Juan Carlos Sanchez España

  • 1Department of Neurological Surgery (ADS, GG, TET, AF, AM, LR, JE), Institut Clínic de Neurociències, and Departments of Ophthalmology (JCSE, JMF), Anesthesiology (JT), and ENT Surgery (ML, IA), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Abstract

Insights

The endoscopic superior eyelid approach is safe for skull base tumors, with most orbital complications resolving quickly. Persistent issues are rare and linked to specific tumor types or treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Ophthalmology
  • Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Background:

  • The endoscopic superior eyelid approach is a novel, minimally invasive technique for skull base tumors.
  • Complications, particularly orbital outcomes, require further investigation for diverse tumor types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze surgical complications of the endoscopic superior eyelid approach in skull base tumor treatment.
  • To specifically evaluate orbital outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of patients treated with the endoscopic superior eyelid approach.
  • Complications categorized by approach-related vs. tumor removal-related.
  • Ocular complications assessed early, late, and persistently; patient satisfaction measured via Park questionnaire.

Main Results:

  • 20 patients with various skull base tumors (meningiomas, schwannomas, etc.) were included.
  • Early complications included eyelid edema (100%), diplopia (30%), and periorbital edema (15%), mostly resolving.
  • Persistent complications (5-10%) included limited eye abduction, neuropathic pain, and enophthalmos (with VP shunt).

Conclusions:

  • The endoscopic superior eyelid approach demonstrates safety and satisfactory outcomes for various skull base tumors.
  • Most orbital complications are transient; persistent issues are more common with intraconal lesions.
  • Patient satisfaction is high, with minimal cosmetic or functional complaints.