Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
Could normalization improve robustness of abdominal MRI radiomic features?
Valentina Giannini1,2, Jovana Panic2,3, Daniele Regge2
1University of Turin, Department of Surgical Science, Turin, Italy.
Feature normalization methods significantly improve radiomics feature robustness across different scanners and institutions, unlike image normalization techniques. ComBat, z-score, and 3-sigma normalization are most effective for reproducible cancer imaging analysis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Radiomics
- Oncology
Background:
- Radiomics enhances cancer patient management, but generalizability is limited by multi-center, multi-scanner data.
- Image and feature normalization are proposed to address reproducibility issues in radiomics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of various image and feature normalization methods on radiomics feature robustness.
- To assess the performance of normalization techniques using a multicenter, multi-scanner abdominal MRI dataset.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective collection of 88 rectal MRIs from 3 institutions (4 scanners).
- Analysis of 93 radiomics features from six 3D regions of interest on the obturator muscle.
- Application and comparison of min-max, 1st-99th percentiles, 3-Sigma, z-score, mean centering, histogram normalization, Nyul-Udupa, and ComBat harmonization.
Main Results:
- Image normalization methods generally reduced intensity variability but often worsened feature robustness.
- Z-score image normalization slightly improved feature similarity from 9/93 to 10/93.
- Feature normalization methods, particularly 3-sigma, z-score, and ComBat, substantially increased feature similarity to 79/93.
- No image normalization method strongly increased the number of statistically similar features.
Conclusions:
- Feature normalization, especially ComBat, z-score, and 3-sigma, is crucial for enhancing radiomics feature robustness in multicenter studies.
- Image normalization alone is insufficient to guarantee the generalizability of radiomics findings across different imaging environments.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

