Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Aneurysm Prevalence and Quality of Life During Screening in Relatives of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial
Liselore A Mensing1, Rick J van Tuijl2, Jacoba P Greving2
1From the UMC Utrecht Brain Center (L.A.M., G.J.E.R., Y.M.R.), Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Department of Radiology (R.J.v.T., B.K.V., I.C.v.d.S.), and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (J.P.G., N.P.A.Z.), University Medical Center Utrecht; Department of Neurology (M.J.H.W.), University Medical Center Leiden; and Department of Neurosurgery (D.V., W.P.V.), Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands. l.a.mensing-3@umcutrecht.nl.
Background And Objectives:
Screening for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) is effective for first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Whether screening is also effective for FDRs of patients with UIA is unknown. We determined the yield of screening in such FDRs, assessed rupture risk and treatment decisions of aneurysms that were found, identified potential high-risk subgroups, and studied the effects of screening on quality of life (QoL).
Methods:
In this prospective cohort study, we included FDRs, aged 20-70 years, of patients with UIA without a family history of aSAH who visited the Neurology outpatient clinic in 1 of 3 participating tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. FDRs were screened for UIA with magnetic resonance angiography between 2017 and 2021. We determined UIA prevalence and developed a prediction model for UIA risk at screening using multivariable logistic regression. QoL was evaluated with questionnaires 6 times during the first year after screening and assessed with a linear mixed-effects model.
Results:
We detected 24 UIAs in 23 of 461 screened FDRs, resulting in a 5.0% prevalence (95% CI 3.2-7.4). The median aneurysm size was 3 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4 mm), and the median 5-year rupture risk assessed with the PHASES score was 0.7% (IQR 0.4%-0.9%). All UIAs received follow-up imaging, and none were treated preventively. After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 13-38 months), no UIA had changed. Predicted UIA risk at screening ranged between 2.3% and 14.7% with the highest risk in FDRs who smoke and have excessive alcohol consumption (c-statistic: 0.76; 95% CI 0.65-0.88). At all survey moments, health-related QoL and emotional functioning were comparable with those in a reference group from the general population. One FDR with a positive screening result expressed regret about screening.
Discussion:
Based on the current data, we do not advise screening FDRs of patients with UIA because all identified UIAs had a low rupture risk. We observed no negative effect of screening on QoL. A longer follow-up should determine the risk of aneurysm growth requiring preventive treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction

