Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fiducial-Based Statistical Intervals for Bounded Bioanalytical Data Using the Kumaraswamy Distribution.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Bayesian randomized basket trial design: a case study from the ultra-rare invasive mold infections.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Evaluating longitudinal treatment effects for Duchenne muscular dystrophy using dynamically enriched Bayesian small sample, sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial (snSMART).

Biometrics·2025
Same author

Study duration prediction for clinical trials with time-to-event endpoints accounting for heterogeneous population.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2025
Same author

Handling missing values in patient-reported outcome data in the presence of intercurrent events.

BMC medical research methodology·2025
Same author

Visualization of liquid-liquid phase transitions using a tiny G-quadruplex binding protein.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Impact of Information Leakage in Platform Trials With Survival Endpoints on Type I Error Control.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Harmonic Fowlkes-Mallows Index for Medical Diagnostics Tests and Optimal Cut-Off Point Selection of Binary Diseases.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Early Phase Dose-Finding Designs for CAR-T Cell Therapies.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Optimizing Randomization Ratios in Clinical Trials With Survival Endpoints.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

CUI-MET: A Clinical Utility Index Based Analysis and Decision Framework for Dose Optimization in Multiple-Dose, Multiple-Outcome Randomized Trials.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Will the Pharmaceutical Industry Need Statisticians in an AI World?

Pharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A High Throughput MHC II Binding Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Peptide Epitopes
07:59

A High Throughput MHC II Binding Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Peptide Epitopes

Published on: March 25, 2014

15.0K

Modeling immunogenecity data to establish screening bioassays cut point.

Jorge Quiroz1, Satrajit Roychoudhury2, Thomas Steinmetz1

  • 1MRL, Research CMC Statistics, Merck & Co. Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|July 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares statistical methods for analyzing anti-drug antibody (ADA) data, which often exhibits variability. It highlights the need for robust methods to accurately calculate assay cut points for reliable immunogenicity testing.

Keywords:
asymmetric-t distributionquantile estimation for repeated measurementquantile regressionskew-t distributionvariance-gamma distribution

More Related Videos

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

17.8K
A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening
15:28

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening

Published on: January 17, 2014

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A High Throughput MHC II Binding Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Peptide Epitopes
07:59

A High Throughput MHC II Binding Assay for Quantitative Analysis of Peptide Epitopes

Published on: March 25, 2014

15.0K
In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
07:25

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis

Published on: May 4, 2017

17.8K
A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening
15:28

A Microscopic Phenotypic Assay for the Quantification of Intracellular Mycobacteria Adapted for High-throughput/High-content Screening

Published on: January 17, 2014

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacokinetics

Background:

  • Anti-drug antibody (ADA) immunogenicity testing is crucial for biopharmaceutical safety and efficacy.
  • Biological and analytical variability in ADA responses can lead to complex symmetric and asymmetric data patterns.
  • Existing statistical methods may be unreliable due to assumptions about data symmetry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey and compare parametric and nonparametric statistical models for analyzing diverse ADA data.
  • To evaluate the suitability of these models for calculating assay cut points.
  • To provide recommendations for selecting appropriate methods for ADA data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of parametric models capable of handling asymmetric data, including symmetric cases.
  • Investigation of two underutilized nonparametric approaches for cut point calculations.
  • Conducting a simulation study to assess method performance.
  • Evaluation using four distinct published ADA datasets.

Main Results:

  • Parametric models offer flexibility for various symmetric and asymmetric ADA data distributions.
  • Nonparametric approaches show potential for cut point calculations, though less explored.
  • Method performance varies depending on the specific data characteristics and chosen model.

Conclusions:

  • Advanced statistical models are necessary to accurately analyze complex ADA data.
  • Careful selection of methods is essential for reliable assay cut point determination in immunogenicity assessments.
  • Further research into nonparametric methods could enhance ADA data analysis.