Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
A Comparison of the Checklist Scoring Systems, Global Rating Systems, and Borderline Regression Method for an
Kossay Elabd1, Husam Abdul-Kadir2, Abdullah Alkhenizan2
1Family Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Background:
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using the checklist and global rating scores to evaluate the clinical competency of medical students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). Additionally, the study assesses the appropriateness of using the borderline regression method to set standards for small-scale OSCE exams and determines if the estimated passing marks differ significantly from the university's prefixed passing score of 70%. The study also examines whether the university should utilize the borderline regression method to determine passing scores for each OSCE exam instead of a set passing score.
Methods:
The study analyzed medical students' grades in 11 OSCE exams in the 2022-2023 academic year at Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Students received family medicine clerkship rotations, and after each rotation, they took an OSCE exam consisting of three stations that family medicine consultants graded. The exam included a checklist of 30 tasks and a five-level global rank scale. The study collected all the checklist marks and global rank grades and analyzed them using IBM® Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS® Statistics) software. The statistical tests used were descriptive statistics, the T-test, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation.
Results:
The study showed that students were more likely to pass when using the global rating system than the checklist scoring system. Additionally, students had a significantly lower passing rate when using the higher cut-off passing score estimated using the borderline regression method compared to the pre-set passing score of 70% established by the university (with a p-value of 0.00).
Conclusion:
Each scoring system has advantages and disadvantages, but they complement each other. Combining scoring systems can produce a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of a candidate's performance. The study also emphasizes the importance of carefully selecting and validating cut-off points in OSCE exams to ensure fairness and consistency in assessment.
More Related Videos
15:49Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Head and Neck
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure: