Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.4K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Pilot Study to Assess the Performance of Phase-Sensitive Breast Tomosynthesis.

Radiology·2022
Same author

A clinical tool to predict severe pain during wound dressing changes.

Pain·2022
Same author

Determining Roe and Metz model parameters for simulating multireader multicase confidence-of-disease rating data based on real-data or conjectured Obuchowski-Rockette parameter estimates.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2022
Same author

Interpretation time for screening mammography as a function of the number of computer-aided detection marks.

Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)·2020
Same author

Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.

Statistics in medicine·2018
Same author

Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.

Statistics in medicine·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 1, 2026

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

7.4K

Roe and Metz identical-test simulation model for validating multi-reader methods of analysis for comparing different

Stephen L Hillis1

  • 1University of Iowa, Departments of Radiology and Biostatistics, Iowa City, Iowa, United States.

Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
|July 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces the Roe and Metz identical-test model for multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) analysis, crucial for validating statistical methods in diagnostic imaging. It highlights potential issues with negative variance estimates when tests are nearly identical.

Keywords:
GallasObuchowski and RocketteRoe and Metzdiagnostic radiologymulti-reader multi-casemulti-reader multi-case analysisreceiver operating characteristic curvetype I error

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.0K
Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

723

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 1, 2026

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
07:12

Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model

Published on: September 28, 2017

7.4K
Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
07:13

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.0K
Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects
08:39

Longitudinal Micro-Computed Tomography Image Analysis for User-Defined Region of Interest in Critical-Sized Bone Defects

Published on: June 24, 2025

723

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biostatistics
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Research

Background:

  • The Roe and Metz model is standard for simulating multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) data in diagnostic imaging.
  • Existing null models for MRMC analysis have limitations, not fully representing identical tests.
  • This gap hinders validation of statistical methods for diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formulate a Roe and Metz identical-test model for MRMC data.
  • To demonstrate the utility of this model in validating Obuchowski-Rockette method constraints.
  • To address limitations in current MRMC null model formulations.

Main Methods:

  • Derived the Roe and Metz identical-test model by modifying the standard null model.
  • Assumed identical test conditions to create the new model.
  • Utilized simulated data from the identical-test model for validation.

Main Results:

  • Established the importance of Obuchowski-Rockette model constraints for preventing negative variance estimates.
  • Demonstrated that negative variance estimates can occur when tests are similar but not identical.
  • Highlighted the relevance of these findings to current MRMC analysis methods.

Conclusions:

  • The Roe and Metz identical-test model is essential for validating MRMC statistical methods.
  • Careful consideration of test similarity is needed to avoid negative variance estimates.
  • This work provides a robust framework for evaluating diagnostic accuracy studies.