Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Factors Associated With Improved Pediatric Resuscitative Care in General Emergency Departments
Marc A Auerbach1, Travis Whitfill1, Erin Montgomery2
1Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Insights
Pediatric resuscitative care quality in general emergency departments (GEDs) is low. Affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC), higher pediatric volume, and specific coordinator roles were linked to better care quality.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
Background:
- Pediatric resuscitation requires specialized skills often lacking in general emergency departments (GEDs).
- Assessing the quality of pediatric emergency care in non-specialized settings is crucial for patient safety.
- Existing quality metrics may not fully capture the nuances of pediatric resuscitation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the quality of pediatric resuscitative care delivered in GEDs.
- To identify hospital-level factors associated with superior pediatric resuscitation quality.
Main Methods:
- A prospective observational study using in situ simulations of critical pediatric emergencies (seizure, sepsis, cardiac arrest).
- Interprofessional teams in GEDs participated, with care quality measured by a composite quality score (CQS).
- Analysis explored associations between CQS and modifiable/nonmodifiable hospital factors.
Main Results:
- The median CQS was 62.8 out of 100 across 287 teams from 175 GEDs.
- Higher quality was associated with affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC), higher pediatric volume, and Northeast/Midwest location.
- Adjusted analyses confirmed these associations and added the presence of nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinators.
Conclusions:
- Pediatric resuscitative care quality in GEDs is suboptimal, as indicated by simulation-based assessment.
- Key factors for higher quality care include PAMC affiliation, dedicated pediatric emergency care coordinators, high pediatric patient volume, and geographic location.
- Pediatric readiness scores showed only a weak correlation with resuscitation quality.
Objectives:
To describe the quality of pediatric resuscitative care in general emergency departments (GEDs) and to determine hospital-level factors associated with higher quality.
Methods:
Prospective observational study of resuscitative care provided to 3 in situ simulated patients (infant seizure, infant sepsis, and child cardiac arrest) by interprofessional GED teams. A composite quality score (CQS) was measured and the association of this score with modifiable and nonmodifiable hospital-level factors was explored.
Results:
A median CQS of 62.8 of 100 (interquartile range 50.5-71.1) was noted for 287 resuscitation teams from 175 emergency departments. In the unadjusted analyses, a higher score was associated with the modifiable factor of an affiliation with a pediatric academic medical center (PAMC) and the nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. In the adjusted analyses, a higher CQS was associated with modifiable factors of an affiliation with a PAMC and the designation of both a nurse and physician pediatric emergency care coordinator, and nonmodifiable factors of higher pediatric volume and location in the Northeast and Midwest. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.
Conclusions:
A low quality of pediatric resuscitative care, measured using simulation, was noted across a cohort of GEDs. Hospital factors associated with higher quality included: an affiliation with a PAMC, designation of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, higher pediatric volume, and geographic location. A weak correlation was noted between quality and pediatric readiness scores.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...

