Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

06:04
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
628
Developing and validating the Japanese version of the Referential Thinking Scale: A cross-sectional study
Jun Sasaki1, Seiji Muranaka1, Kotomi Arahata2
1Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Plos One
|July 7, 2023
Summary
This study developed a Japanese scale to measure ideas of reference in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (IoR-S). Findings reveal distinct predictors for IoR-S and paranoia (IoR-P), with social anxiety and negative moods impacting both.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
Background:
- Ideas of reference in paranoia (IoR-P) and schizophrenia spectrum disorders (IoR-S) stem from different psychological constructs.
- The interaction between IoR-P and IoR-S, despite overlapping life periods, remains unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- Develop and validate the Japanese version of the Referential Thinking Scale (J-REF) for assessing IoR-S.
- Investigate the predictors of both IoR-P and IoR-S in a Japanese population.
Main Methods:
- Validated the Japanese Referential Thinking Scale (J-REF) for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity.
- Employed hierarchical regression analyses to identify predictors of IoR-P and IoR-S in Japanese adults in their 20s.
Main Results:
- The J-REF demonstrated strong psychometric properties.
- Public self-consciousness predicted IoR-P, while schizotypy dimensions predicted IoR-S.
- Social anxiety and negative moods were identified as common contributors to both IoR-P and IoR-S.
Conclusions:
- This study provides direct evidence for distinct predictors underlying IoR-P and IoR-S.
- The research validates the J-REF scale in an Asian context, suggesting cultural similarities in referential thinking.
- Identifies public self-consciousness, schizotypy, social anxiety, and negative moods as key factors influencing these phenomena.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.4K
Measures of Intelligence
7.6K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
7.6K
Nominal Level of Measurement
29.7K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
29.7K
Observational Studies
8.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.7K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
64
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
64

