Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.4K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.4K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

148
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
148
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

280
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
280

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advancing evidence-informed policy: outcomes of the global research agenda on knowledge translation.

Health research policy and systems·2026
Same author

Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

How Cancer Online Support Groups Work, for Whom, and in What Circumstances: Realist Review.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Integrating Planetary Health in Health Guidelines (GRADE Guidance 46).

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Interprofessional teams and capacity in collaborative primary care: a rapid scoping review.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same author

Assessing the impact, uptake and use of reporting guidelines for patient and public involvement in research: GRIPP2 - study protocol for a meta-research project.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Cohort profile: Sheyang Mini Birth Cohort Study (SMBCS).

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Quebec lung, liver and heart transplant recipients' perspectives on self-narratives and their experiences in creative writing workshops during the transplantation journey: a qualitative study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Impact of climatic variables on postoperative outcomes in various surgical disciplines: a systematic review.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

ADHD and cardiometabolic risk profile in adults with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal register-based study.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Understanding the impact of the follow-up period on the association between excess body weight, and cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective cohort study of the UK Biobank.

BMJ open·2026
Same journal

Temporal associations between incident physical health problems/sensory impairments and challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a population-based longitudinal cohort study of primary care in England.

BMJ open·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K

Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews' methods: protocol for an eDelphi study.

Ariany M Vieira1,2, Geneviève Szczepanik2, Chiara de Waure3

  • 1Department of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.

BMJ Open
|July 7, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study identifies priority methodological questions for rapid systematic reviews (RSRs) to improve healthcare decision-making. An eDelphi study with experts and stakeholders established a consensus on key areas for efficient RSR development.

Keywords:
health economicshealth policypublic healthstatistics & research methods

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 24, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

11.9K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Rapid systematic reviews (RSRs) offer timely healthcare information but face challenges due to methodological uncertainties.
  • Prioritizing research in RSR methodology is crucial for efficient and effective development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To achieve consensus among experts and stakeholders on the most critical methodological questions for RSRs.
  • To guide the future development and efficient execution of rapid systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • An eDelphi study involving evidence synthesis experts and diverse stakeholders.
  • Iterative survey rounds using LimeSurvey for rating and ranking methodological questions.
  • A final consensus meeting to establish a priority list of RSR methodological issues.

Main Results:

  • Identification of key methodological questions through a multi-round consensus process.
  • Prioritization of specific areas within the RSR process, from question generation to report writing.
  • Consensus achieved on critical issues impacting the efficiency and effectiveness of RSRs.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a prioritized agenda for RSR methodological research.
  • This consensus will inform future efforts to optimize rapid systematic review processes.
  • Addressing these priorities will enhance the utility of RSRs for healthcare decision-making.