Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

09:21
Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
12.1K
Biosimilarity. Do not confuse biosimilar and biocopy. Example of tenecteplase
A Astier1, R Abouqal2, L Abid3
1Académie nationale de pharmacie, faculté de pharmacie, 4, avenue de l'Observatoire, 75004 Paris, France.
Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises
|July 8, 2023
Summary
Non-innovator biological products, like Elaxim®, may differ significantly from reference biologics. Thorough quality and clinical data are essential to confirm biosimilarity and ensure patient safety.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Biotechnology
- Drug Development
Background:
- Non-innovator biological products (NIBPs), or 'biocopies,' are marketed at lower prices but may lack rigorous quality standards.
- These products can exhibit substantial differences in physicochemical and pharmacological properties compared to their reference biologics.
- Tenecteplase (TNK-tpA) is a thrombolytic agent for acute myocardial infarction; a biocopy, Elaxim®, is available in India.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate whether Elaxim®, a tenecteplase biocopy, meets the criteria for a biosimilar to the originator product.
- To highlight the critical need for comprehensive quality and clinical data before marketing biological products as equivalent.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of available data on Elaxim® and originator tenecteplase.
- Comparative analysis of physicochemical and pharmacological properties.
- Assessment of available clinical data and trial design.
Main Results:
- Elaxim® shows substantially lower clot lysis activity than originator tenecteplase.
- The biocopy contains high concentrations of foreign proteins, posing potential immunological risks.
- Limited clinical data exists, with no randomized trials demonstrating equivalence to the originator.
Conclusions:
- Elaxim® cannot be considered a biosimilar to originator tenecteplase due to significant property differences.
- Confirmation of pharmaceutical quality, preclinical, and clinical data is mandatory for claiming clinical equivalence.
- This case underscores the importance of stringent evaluation for non-innovator biological products.

