Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Barriers and facilitators to accessibility, continuity, validity, flexibility, and provider-family relationship along
Mélina Rivard1, Marjorie Morin1, Corinne Rochefort1
1Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada, 100 Sherbrooke E Street, Montréal H2X 1C3, Canada.
Background:
Parents of children with developmental disabilities must navigate a complex network to obtain a diagnosis and interventions for their child. However, their subjective experience of this journey has yet to be analyzed through the lens of a theorical framework that could support research, organizational program evaluation, and facilitate providers' reflection on how to enhance families' diagnostic services trajectory.
Aims:
This study sought to examine the diagnostic journey as experienced by 77 parents whose children were recently diagnosed with developmental disabilities (e.g., autism, intellectual disability) in the metropolitan area of Montréal, Québec (Canada).
Methods And Procedures:
A mixed qualitative content analysis approach was used to describe their perspective on barriers and facilitators in reference to the five dimensions of the Evaluation of the Trajectory Autism for Parents (ETAP) model (Rivard et al., 2020): accessibility, continuity, validity, flexibility, and provider-family relationship.
Outcomes And Results:
The barriers and facilitators related to systemic factors identified by parents were consistent with the five dimensions outlined by the ETAP model. However, beyond these characteristics of the service delivery system, parents additionally identified their own, personal facilitators CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study supports the relevance of the ETAP framework to understanding the experience of families seeking a diagnosis. It also reinforces the potential contributions of this model to organize extant and future research as well as structure program evaluation and improvements.
Related Concept Videos
Intellectual Disability
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...

