Myocardial Contraction Fraction is not a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Acute Systolic Heart Failure: A Brief

Andrew K Chang1, Jakrin Kewcharoen1, Danielle M Henkel1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Insights

Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) is not a reliable predictor of outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). Echocardiographic measures like tricuspid regurgitation velocity and left atrial diameter are better indicators of adverse events.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Heart Failure Research

Background:

  • Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) is a volumetric measure of myocardial shortening.
  • Its utility in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF) remains under-evaluated.
  • Accurate prognostic markers for SHF are crucial for patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the prognostic value of MCF in patients hospitalized with acute SHF.
  • To compare MCF with ejection fraction (EF) in predicting 30-day and 365-day adverse outcomes.
  • To identify other echocardiographic parameters associated with adverse events in SHF.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 1282 adult patients admitted with acute SHF (2013-2018).
  • Analysis of transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE), laboratory, and demographic data.
  • MCF calculated from M-mode measurements; primary outcomes were 30-day readmission/mortality and 365-day mortality.

Main Results:

  • MCF showed a weak correlation with visually estimated ejection fraction (EF) (r=0.356, P<0.001).
  • Neither MCF nor EF was significantly associated with 30-day or 365-day adverse outcomes.
  • Higher tricuspid regurgitation velocity, larger left atrial diameter, and moderate/greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation predicted adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • MCF and EF do not provide prognostic information in patients with acute SHF.
  • Echocardiographic predictors of postdischarge adverse events include TR velocity, LA diameter, and MR/TR severity.
  • These findings highlight the limitations of MCF and EF in SHF prognostication.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos