Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025
The Use of Reverse Phase Protein Arrays RPPA to Explore Protein Expression Variation within Individual Renal Cell Cancers
Published on: January 22, 2013
Genomic profiles of renal cell carcinoma in a small Chinese cohort
Sheng Tai1,2,3, Dan-Dan Xu4,5, Zhixian Yu6
1Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Objectives:
Our aim was to describe the molecular characteristics of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) and develop a small panel of RCC-associated genes from a large panel of cancer-related genes.
Materials And Methods:
Clinical data of 55 patients with RCC diagnosed in four hospitals from September 2021 to August 2022 were collected. Among the 55 patients, 38 were diagnosed with clear cell RCC (ccRCC), and the other 17 were diagnosed with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC), including 10 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma, 2 cases of hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome (HLRCC), 1 eosinophilic papillary RCC, 1 tubular cystic carcinoma, 1 TFE3 gene fusion RCC, and 2 RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. For each patient, 1123 cancer-related genes and 79 RCC-associated genes were analyzed.
Results:
The most frequent mutations in a large panel of 1123 cancer-related genes in the overall population of RCC patients were VHL (51%), PBRM1 (35%), BAP1 (16%), KMT2D (15%), PTPRD (15%), and SETD2 (15%). For ccRCC patients, mutations in VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SERD2 can reach 74%, 50%, 24%, and 18%, respectively, while for nccRCC patients, the most frequent mutation was FH (29%), MLH3 (24%), ARID1A (18%), KMT2D (18%), and CREBBP (18%). The germline mutation rate in all 55 patients reached 12.7% (five with FH, one with ATM, and one with RAD50). The small panel containing only 79 RCC-associated genes demonstrated that mutations of VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2 in ccRCC patients were 74%, 50%, 24%, and 18% respectively, while for the nccRCC cohort, the most frequent mutations were FH (29%), ARID1A (18%), ATM (12%), MSH6 (12%), BRAF (12%), and KRAS (12%). For ccRCC patients, the spectrum of mutations by large and small panels was almost the same, while for nccRCC patients, the mutation spectrum showed some differences. Even though the most frequent mutations (FH and ARID1A) in nccRCC were both demonstrated by large panels and small panels, other less frequent mutations such as MLH3, KMT2D, and CREBBP were not shown by the small panel.
Conclusion:
Our study revealed that nccRCC is more heterogeneous than ccRCC. For nccRCC patients, the small panel shows a more clear profile of genetic characteristics by replacing MLH3, KMT2D, and CREBBP with ATM, MSH6, BRAF, and KRAS, which may help predict prognosis and make clinical decisions.
