Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
An Introduction to Reviewing Research Articles for Academic Journals
William B DeHart1, Edward Griffin2, Shala Sundaram3
1Optum Labs, Minnetonka, MN.
Abstract:
Description Among the pillars of science is the galvanizing process of peer review. Editors of medical and scientific publications recruit specialty leaders to evaluate the quality of manuscripts. These peer reviewers help to ensure that data are collected, analyzed, and interpreted as accurately as possible, thereby moving the field forward and ultimately improving patient care. As physician-scientists, we are given the opportunity and responsibility to participate in the peer review process. There are many benefits to engaging in the peer review process including exposure to cutting-edge research, growing your connection with the academic community, and fulfilling the scholarly activity requirements of your accrediting organization. In the present manuscript, we discuss the key components of the peer review process and hope that it will serve as a primer for the novice reviewer and as a useful guide for the experienced reviewer.
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Ethics in Research
Significance Testing: Overview
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...

