Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Author Spotlight: Exploring Microglial Interactions with Stress-Response Circuitry Using the Limited Bedding and Nesting Model
Published on: July 12, 2024
Large motherhood penalties in US administrative microdata
Douglas Almond1,2, Yi Cheng1, Cecilia Machado3,4
1Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Even in advantageous situations, the motherhood penalty persists, with higher-earning women facing significant earnings drops after childbirth compared to their male partners. This penalty widens over time, contrary to expectations.
Area of Science:
- Economics
- Sociology
- Labor Market Studies
Background:
- Previous research indicates a motherhood penalty in US survey data.
- The extent of this penalty in specific contexts remains under-explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the motherhood penalty in unique contexts where it might be reduced.
- To analyze the impact of childbearing on women's earnings relative to men in diverse family and firm structures.
Main Methods:
- Utilized administrative data from the US Unemployment Insurance program, encompassing 811,000 quarterly earnings histories.
- Compared earnings trajectories of women and men in couples where women initially earned more, at female-led firms, and at female-dominated firms.
Main Results:
- The motherhood penalty was not diminished in any of the tested contexts; it often increased over time post-childbearing.
- In female-breadwinner families, higher-earning women experienced a 60% earnings drop relative to male partners.
- Women were less likely to move to higher-paying firms and more likely to leave the labor force after childbirth compared to men.
Conclusions:
- The findings present a discouraging outlook on the motherhood penalty, exceeding previous research.
- Specific contexts assumed to mitigate the penalty did not show this effect.
- Proximate mechanisms include reduced firm mobility and increased labor force exit for women post-childbearing.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Longitudinal Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Sex-linked Disorders
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

