Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2025

Low-cost Custom Fabrication and Mode-locked Operation of an All-normal-dispersion Femtosecond Fiber Laser for Multiphoton Microscopy
Published on: November 22, 2019
A Novel Closed-Loop Control to Solve Light Source Power Fluctuations in the Fiber-Optic Gyroscope
Shijie Zheng1, Mengyu Ren1, Xin Luo1
1Institute of Laser & Micro/Nano Engineering, College of Electronics & Information Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Two new methods, double period modulation (DPM) and triple period modulation (TPM), effectively compensate for light source power (LSP) fluctuations in interferometric fiber-optic gyroscopes (IFOGs), significantly improving bias stability.
Area of Science:
- Optics and Photonics
- Sensor Technology
- Control Systems Engineering
Background:
- Interferometric fiber-optic gyroscopes (IFOGs) are susceptible to performance degradation caused by light source power (LSP) fluctuations.
- Accurate compensation for LSP fluctuations is crucial for maintaining IFOG performance, especially when the error signal is uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate two novel compensation methods, double period modulation (DPM) and triple period modulation (TPM), for uncertain gyroscope errors caused by LSP fluctuations.
- To compare the performance and circuit requirements of DPM and TPM in IFOGs.
Main Methods:
- Implementation of double period modulation (DPM) and triple period modulation (TPM) techniques to mitigate the impact of LSP fluctuations.
- Experimental validation of DPM and TPM performance across a range of LSP fluctuation frequencies (1 kHz to 16 kHz).
Main Results:
- Both DPM and TPM significantly improve bias stability in IFOGs, achieving up to a 95% enhancement at low fluctuation frequencies (1-2 kHz).
- At higher fluctuation frequencies (4-16 kHz), DPM demonstrates superior performance, improving bias stability by approximately 95%, while TPM achieves about 88% improvement.
- DPM offers better performance but requires more complex circuitry, whereas TPM has lower circuit demands, making it suitable for small fiber-coil applications.
Conclusions:
- DPM and TPM are effective strategies for compensating uncertain gyroscope errors arising from LSP fluctuations in IFOGs.
- The choice between DPM and TPM depends on the specific application requirements, balancing performance needs with circuit complexity and size constraints.
More Related Videos
14:18Automation of Mode Locking in a Nonlinear Polarization Rotation Fiber Laser through Output Polarization Measurements
Published on: February 28, 2016
09:01Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
Published on: April 4, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Open and closed-loop control systems
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
Load-frequency control
Feedback control systems
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
Gyroscope: Precession