Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

00:07
Rapid Evaluation of Toxicity of Chemical Compounds Using Zebrafish Embryos
Published on: August 25, 2019
10.7K
Comparative Toxicity of Seven Aqueous Film-Forming Foam to In Vitro Systems and Mus
Andrew G East1, Allison M Narizzano1, Lindsay A Holden1
1Defense Centers for Public Health, Aberdeen, Maryland, USA.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|July 11, 2023
Summary
New per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS)-free foams show different toxicity profiles than PFAS-containing foams. PFAS-free foams did not increase liver weights, unlike the PFAS-containing reference foam, suggesting safer alternatives.
Area of Science:
- Environmental toxicology
- Chemical safety assessment
- Toxicology
Background:
- Aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) historically contain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
- There is a critical need to evaluate the safety of PFAS-free AFFF alternatives to avoid regrettable substitutions.
- Understanding the comparative toxicity of different AFFF formulations is essential for environmental and human health protection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively evaluate the toxicity of six PFAS-free AFFFs against one PFAS-containing AFFF.
- To assess the in vivo and in vitro toxicological profiles of these AFFF formulations.
- To provide early data for the selection of potentially safer PFAS-free AFFF alternatives.
Main Methods:
- In vivo toxicity testing in an outbred mouse species.
- In vitro toxicological assays, including the Microtox® assay.
- Short-term, high-concentration exposure studies.
Main Results:
- The PFAS-containing AFFF reference product induced increased relative liver weights in mice.
- PFAS-free AFFFs were associated with decreased or unaffected relative liver weights.
- In vitro toxicity was largely uniform across PFAS-free AFFFs, with variability noted in the Microtox® assay.
Conclusions:
- The toxicological profiles of PFAS-free AFFFs differ significantly from PFAS-containing AFFF, particularly concerning liver weight effects.
- PFAS-free AFFFs may represent a less toxic alternative to traditional PFAS-containing foams, but further comprehensive testing is warranted.
- This study provides initial data to guide the selection of AFFF alternatives and prevent regrettable substitutions, highlighting the need for broader toxicological assessments across different species and life stages.
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I
Compendial dissolution methods are standardized procedures defined by pharmacopeias to evaluate the rate at which a drug dissolves in a specific medium. These methods ensure batch-to-batch consistency, enable quality control, and support the prediction of drug bioavailability. They are critical for both immediate and modified-release drug products.The apparatuses used for dissolution testing differ in their design and mechanical function, but all aim to simulate the physiological environment of...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II
Various dissolution methods are utilized to assess a drug’s dissolution rate, including the flow-through cell, paddle-over-disk, cylinder, and reciprocating disk methods.The flow-through cell apparatus (USP (United States Pharmacopeia) method 4) comprises a reservoir for the dissolution medium and a pump that propels the medium through the cell containing the test sample. This method is crucial for assessing modified-release dosage forms with minimally soluble active ingredients, maintaining...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Alternative Methods
Alternative drug dissolution methods include the rotating bottle, intrinsic dissolution test, peristalsis, and the Franz diffusion cell method. The rotating bottle method involves meticulously rotating tightly capped controlled-release beads in a temperature-controlled bath. Periodic decanting of samples allows for residue assay, followed by refilling with fresh medium and testing at various pH levels to emulate the gastrointestinal tract conditions.In contrast, the intrinsic dissolution test...
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

