Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Severe allergic systemic reaction to personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic
Pasquale Filippo Italiano1, Matthew Krummenacher2, Michaela Lucas3
1Medical Education, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia he24079@health.wa.gov.au.
Abstract:
Our case describes a hospital worker who suffered a severe reaction to personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. After researching the excipient list of her PPE and completing a literature review, we postulated that isocyanates used in the production of the polyurethane band of the N95 mask was the cause for her reaction. In the absence of standardised testing, we tested this hypothesis by replicating her reaction to PPE by using a commercially available isocyanate patch, identifying diphenylmethane-4, 4-diisocyanate as the culprit agent.We recommended caution in the use of polyurethane containing N95 masks- for people reporting allergic reaction- and testing for sensitivity for polyurethane. The patient was able to tolerate non-polyurethane containing standard surgical masks, providing an option for PPE in some clinical circumstances. Since avoiding N95 masks, she has not had any further reactions.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Personal Protective Equipment
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
Allergic Drug Reactions
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings II: Doffing

