Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
Published on: October 23, 2020
Statistical Considerations and Software for Designing Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trials (SMART) with
Sasha Kravets1, Amy S Ruppert2,3, Sawyer B Jacobson4,5
1Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
None:
Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs are appropriate for comparing adaptive treatment interventions, in which intermediate outcomes (called tailoring variables) guide subsequent treatment decisions for individual patients. Within a SMART design, patients may be re-randomized to subsequent treatments following the outcomes of their intermediate assessments. In this paper, we provide an overview of statistical considerations necessary to design and implement a two-stage SMART design with a binary tailoring variable and a survival final endpoint. A chronic lymphocytic leukemia trial with a final endpoint of progression-free survival is used as an example for the simulations to assess how design parameters, including, choice of randomization ratios for each stage of randomization, and response rates of the tailoring variable affect the statistical power. We assess the choice of weights from restricted re-randomization on data analyses and appropriate hazard rate assumptions. Specifically, for a given first-stage therapy and prior to the tailoring variable assessment, we assume equal hazard rates for all patients randomized to a treatment arm. After the tailoring variable assessment, individual hazard rates are assumed for each intervention path. Simulation studies demonstrate that the response rate of the binary tailoring variable impacts power as it directly impacts the distribution of patients. We also confirm that when the first stage randomization is 1:1, it is not necessary to consider the first stage randomization ratio when applying the weights. We provide an R-shiny application for obtaining power for a given sample size for SMART designs.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
08:36Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Cancer Survival Analysis