Impact of maternal whole-cell or acellular pertussis primary immunization on neonatal immune response

Pablo Martin Aispuro1, Daniela Bottero1, María Eugenia Zurita1

  • 1Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina.

PubMed

Insights

Maternal immunization with whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP) priming followed by acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) during pregnancy offers longer-lasting protection for infants against pertussis compared to aP-only priming.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Pertussis (whooping cough) remains a global public health concern, necessitating effective immunization strategies.
  • Maternal immunization programs aim to protect infants during their vulnerable early months.
  • The choice between whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP) and acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) for priming and during pregnancy is critical for optimal disease control.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of different maternal pertussis vaccination priming schedules (wP-wP-aPpreg vs. aP-aP-aPpreg) on immune responses and offspring protection against Bordetella pertussis.
  • To evaluate the duration of maternal immunity conferred by these schedules.
  • To investigate potential interference between maternal and neonatal vaccination in offspring.

Main Methods:

  • Mice were immunized using two maternal vaccination schemes: wP-wP-aPpreg and aP-aP-aPpreg.
  • Immune responses (PTx-specific IgG) were measured in mothers and offspring.
  • Offspring protection against B. pertussis challenge was assessed.
  • The timing of birth relative to maternal aPpreg vaccination was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Both schedules induced pertussis toxin (PTx)-specific IgG in mothers, with sustained levels in the wP-wP-aPpreg group but a decline in the aP-aP-aPpreg group after 22 weeks.
  • The wP-wP-aPpreg scheme induced a mixed Th1/Th2 immune response, while aP-aP-aPpreg induced a predominantly Th2 response.
  • Offspring protection was longer-lasting with the wP-wP-aPpreg schedule, maintaining high IgG levels up to 22 weeks post-maternal vaccination, whereas aP-aP-aPpreg protection waned after 18 weeks.
  • Neonatal vaccination in aP-aP-aPpreg offspring potentially interfered with maternal immunity, increasing susceptibility to B. pertussis infection.

Conclusions:

  • Whole-cell pertussis vaccine (wP) priming followed by acellular pertussis vaccine (aP) during pregnancy provides more durable maternal immunity and offspring protection against pertussis than an acellular-only schedule.
  • The wP-wP-aPpreg schedule supports a more robust and sustained immune response, crucial for protecting infants.
  • Potential interference between maternal and neonatal pertussis vaccination warrants further investigation, especially with acellular vaccine priming.