Usefulness of post-systolic index in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk
Kenji Masada1, Takayuki Hidaka2, Yoji Urabe2
1Department of Cardiology, National Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Aoyamacho 3-1, Kure, 737-0023, Japan. kmasada-hrs@umin.ac.jp.
Insights
Post-systolic index (PSI) aids in risk stratification for non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients. Adding PSI and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) improves risk prediction accuracy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Cardiac Imaging
Background:
- Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography shows usefulness in excluding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in low-risk non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
- The efficacy of post-systolic index (PSI) for risk stratification in NSTE-ACS patients remains largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the usefulness of PSI in facilitating risk stratification for patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.
- To evaluate the added value of PSI and LV GLS in predicting the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Main Methods:
- Echocardiographic strain analysis was performed on 43 patients with suspected intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.
- Coronary angiography (CAG) was used to diagnose CAD, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performance was recorded.
- Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the diagnostic performance of PSI and the combined use of PSI and LV GLS with the GRACE risk score.
Main Results:
- Patients with CAD exhibited significantly higher PSI compared to those without CAD (25% vs 15%, P=0.007).
- A PSI cutoff of >20% demonstrated good performance in detecting PCI, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72.
- The addition of PSI and LV GLS to the GRACE risk score significantly improved the classification of PCI performance (AUC increased from 0.57 to 0.75, net reclassification improvement P=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Post-systolic index (PSI) is a valuable parameter for risk stratification in intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS patients.
- Measuring PSI in routine clinical practice is recommended for improved patient management.
- The combination of PSI and LV GLS enhances the accuracy of risk assessment in NSTE-ACS.
Background:
Although there is reportedly a usefulness of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) on 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography in excluding significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in suspected intermediate- or low-risk non-ST-segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), the efficacy of post-systolic index (PSI) in this context is yet unknown. Therefore, we explored the usefulness of PSI in facilitating stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS.
Methods And Results:
We assessed 50 consecutive patients suspected of intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS, and finally analyzed 43 patients whose echocardiographic images were suitable for strain analysis. All patients underwent CAG. Among the 43 analyzed patients, 26 had CAD, and 21 underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with CAD had higher PSI (25% [20.8-40.3%] vs 15% [8.0-27.5%], P = 0.007). Receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis identified that a PSI of > 20% detected performance of PCI (sensitivity 80.7%, specificity 70.6%, area under curve [AUC] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.88). Moreover, the AUC obtained using the GRACE risk score was 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.75), and increased to 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.90) when PSI and LV GLS were added. Thus, the addition of PSI and LV GLS improved the classification of performance of PCI (net reclassification improvement [95%CI] 0.09 [0.0024-0.18], P = 0.04).
Conclusions:
Post-systolic index is a useful parameter that can facilitate stratification of risk in patients with intermediate- or low-risk NSTE-ACS. We recommend measuring PSI in routine clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Angina II: Classification
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care


