BRAF-MEK Inhibition in Newly Diagnosed Papillary Craniopharyngiomas

Priscilla K Brastianos1, Erin Twohy1, Susan Geyer1

  • 1From Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School (P.K.B., E.R.G., S.T., J.T., A.J.I., W.T.C., D.P.C., H.A.S., F.G.B.), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (D.A.R.), and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Program in Therapeutic Science, Dana-Farber Partners CancerCare (S.S.) - all in Boston; Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center (E.T., S.G., B.K.), Mayo Clinic (T.J.K., M.W.R., P.D.B., E.G.), Rochester, MN; UC Irvine-Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, CA (D.A.B.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (A.L.C.); Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami (M.I.D.L.F.); Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (G.J.L.); Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis (J.C.); Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ (P.K.A.); Northwestern University, Chicago (P.K.); the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (B.M.); and Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus (S.V., M.K.).

Abstract

Insights

Papillary craniopharyngioma patients responded well to BRAF-MEK inhibitor therapy, with 94% achieving a durable objective response. This targeted treatment shows promise for these rare brain tumors, offering a new therapeutic avenue.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Neuro-oncology
  • Genetics

Background:

  • Craniopharyngiomas are primary brain tumors affecting the pituitary-hypothalamic axis, often leading to significant morbidity.
  • Standard treatments like surgery and radiation can cause vision loss, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and memory deficits.
  • Papillary craniopharyngiomas frequently harbor BRAF V600E mutations, yet data on targeted BRAF-MEK inhibition are limited, especially in treatment-naïve patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination therapy in patients with papillary craniopharyngiomas who have not received prior radiation.
  • To determine the objective response rate at 4 months using centrally determined volumetric data as the primary endpoint.

Main Methods:

  • A single-group, phase 2 study was conducted involving patients with BRAF-mutated papillary craniopharyngiomas without prior radiation therapy.
  • Patients received the BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination vemurafenib-cobimetinib in 28-day cycles.
  • Objective response was assessed by centrally determined volumetric measurements.

Main Results:

  • Fifteen of 16 patients (94%) achieved a durable objective partial response or better.
  • The median tumor volume reduction was 91%, with a median follow-up of 22 months.
  • Progression-free survival was 87% at 12 months and 58% at 24 months. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 12 patients, with 3 discontinuing treatment due to toxicity.

Conclusions:

  • The BRAF-MEK inhibitor combination of vemurafenib-cobimetinib demonstrated high efficacy in patients with papillary craniopharyngiomas, with 15 of 16 patients achieving a partial response or better.
  • This targeted therapy represents a promising treatment option for this specific subset of brain tumors.
  • Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and optimal use of BRAF-MEK inhibition in craniopharyngioma treatment.