STREAM-2: Half-Dose Tenecteplase or Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Older Patients With
Frans Van de Werf1, Arsen D Ristić2, Oleg V Averkov3
1Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium (F.V.d.W., K.V., P.S.).
Half-dose tenecteplase in a pharmaco-invasive strategy is a viable option for older patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is delayed. While effective, it carries a higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage, necessitating careful patient selection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) management guidelines suggest pharmaco-invasive treatment when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not timely.
- Full-dose tenecteplase increases intracranial hemorrhage risk in elderly patients.
- The safety and efficacy of half-dose tenecteplase in this population remain unestablished.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a pharmaco-invasive strategy using half-dose tenecteplase in elderly patients with STEMI.
- To compare this strategy against primary PCI when timely intervention is unavailable.
Main Methods:
- The STREAM-2 study randomized patients aged ≥60 with STEMI to either half-dose tenecteplase followed by angiography/PCI or primary PCI.
- Efficacy endpoints included ST resolution and a 30-day composite of death, shock, heart failure, or reinfarction.
- Safety endpoints focused on stroke and non-intracranial bleeding.
Main Results:
- Pharmaco-invasive treatment with half-dose tenecteplase showed comparable ST resolution (85.2% vs. 78.4%) and similar 30-day composite clinical outcomes (12.8% vs. 13.3%) to primary PCI.
- Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 1.5% of the pharmaco-invasive group versus 0% in the primary PCI group.
- Major non-intracranial bleeding was infrequent (<1.5%) in both groups.
Conclusions:
- A half-dose tenecteplase pharmaco-invasive strategy offers comparable efficacy to primary PCI in older STEMI patients when timely PCI is unavailable.
- This approach is a reasonable alternative, provided contraindications to fibrinolysis are respected and anticoagulation is managed carefully.
- The risk of intracranial hemorrhage is higher with this strategy compared to primary PCI.
More Related Videos
05:26Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
