Optimizing diagnostic methods and stem cell transplantation outcomes in pediatric bone marrow failure: a 50-year

Lotte Vissers1, Mirjam van der Burg1, Arjan Lankester1

  • 1Department of Pediatric Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Willem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

PubMed

Insights

Pediatric bone marrow failure (BMF) survival has improved with updated guidelines and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Protocolized diagnostics and timely treatment are key for better outcomes in BMF and severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Pediatric Oncology
  • Stem Cell Transplantation

Background:

  • Peripheral blood cytopenia in children often indicates bone marrow failure (BMF), necessitating prompt diagnosis to prevent complications like infections and bleeding.
  • Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the primary curative therapy for severe persistent cytopenia in pediatric patients, regardless of the BMF cause.
  • Identifying the specific cause of BMF, such as inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) or severe aplastic anemia (SAA), is critical for tailored treatment but often challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To report on management guidelines and HSCT outcomes for pediatric BMF patients, identifying areas for improvement and future challenges.
  • To analyze 5-year outcome data from HSCT cohorts (2017-2023) and compare them with historical data.
  • To compare HSCT outcomes between IBMFS and SAA patients to highlight the complexities of IBMFS and its impact on long-term survival.

Main Methods:

  • Formulation of updated management recommendations based on 50 years of experience, implemented in 2017.
  • Analysis of HSCT cohort data from 2017-2023, comparing outcomes with pre-2017 historical data.
  • Comparative analysis of HSCT outcomes between pediatric patients with IBMFS and SAA.

Main Results:

  • Survival rates significantly improved for SAA patients transplanted after 2017 (5-year OS 97%, EFS 85%) compared to those transplanted before (OS 68%, EFS 59%).
  • A similar positive trend was observed for other BMF patients transplanted after 2017 (OS 89%, EFS 89%) versus before (OS 62%, EFS 59%).
  • Long-term survival in IBMFS patients post-HSCT is lower than in SAA patients due to secondary malignancies and multiorgan toxicity, emphasizing the need for personalized follow-up.

Conclusions:

  • Protocolized, unbiased diagnostic strategies are crucial for identifying the causes of heterogeneous pediatric BMF, preventing treatment delays, and tailoring care.
  • Timely diagnosis (within 3 months), HSCT, and maximal supportive care significantly improve survival by mitigating complications like infection and bleeding.
  • Personalized follow-up protocols for IBMFS patients are essential to manage long-term treatment toxicity and extra-hematological complications, preventing a secondary decline in survival.