Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

132
Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence...
132

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle.

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift·2026
Same author

Polygenic modeling of genetic effects on both phenotypic mean and variance: distributional regression for BMI, blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Do Alopecia Areata and Hair Colour Have a Shared Genetic Component?

Experimental dermatology·2026
Same author

Clinical, Dietary, Lifestyle and Genetic Factors Associated With Age at Onset of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

United European gastroenterology journal·2026
Same author

Methodological guidance on clinical prediction models in mental health research.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Machine learning-driven optimization of specific, compact, and efficient base editors via single-round diversification.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Enhancing cereal productivity via nitrogen use efficiency: from conventional breeding to modern genomics.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transcriptomic analysis reveals FcγR-mediated phagocytosis as a key pathway for the anti-inflammatory action of <i>Polygonatum sibiricum</i> polysaccharides in loach.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

A novel <i>ABO</i> splice site variant underlying the A<sub>3</sub> phenotype: immunogenetic basis and functional dissection.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Case Report: Identification of two novel <i>ALMS1</i> variants in a patient with a ciliopathy resembling Alström syndrome.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Integrative analysis identifies Hspa5 as a key regulator of the ERS/UPR-immune axis in spinal cord injury.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of genomic selection to improve survival of eastern oysters infected with <i>Perkinsus marinus</i>.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

626

AI-based multi-PRS models outperform classical single-PRS models.

Jan Henric Klau1, Carlo Maj2, Hannah Klinkhammer3,4

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Frontiers in Genetics
|July 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adding polygenic risk scores (PRS) from multiple diseases and using machine learning models significantly improves disease risk prediction accuracy compared to single-disease PRS and traditional regression models.

Keywords:
breast cancerdeep learningmachine learningpolygenic risk scoreregression

More Related Videos

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.0K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

318

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

626
Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.0K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

318

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Computational Biology
  • Precision Medicine

Background:

  • Polygenic risk scores (PRS) estimate disease risk using germline alleles.
  • Complex diseases like cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease are influenced by numerous genetic variants.
  • Current PRS models typically use regression-based approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if incorporating PRS from other diseases enhances predictive performance.
  • To investigate if machine learning models, specifically deep learning, improve upon traditional regression for PRS.
  • To assess the overall predictive accuracy of enhanced PRS models.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of multi-PRS models incorporating scores from various diseases.
  • Comparison of machine learning models (deep learning) against standard regression models.
  • Evaluation of predictive performance across different complex diseases.

Main Results:

  • Multi-PRS models demonstrated significant improvement over single-PRS models for disease risk prediction.
  • Machine learning models, particularly deep learning, showed enhanced accuracy compared to regression methods.
  • The integration of multiple PRS and advanced modeling techniques boosts predictive power.

Conclusions:

  • Combining PRS from multiple diseases offers superior predictive capability.
  • Machine learning approaches represent a significant advancement in polygenic risk prediction.
  • These findings support the development of more accurate and comprehensive disease risk assessment tools.