Updating of Implicit Adaptation Processes through Erroneous Numeric Feedback
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
Published on: April 24, 2017
Beverley C Larssen1,2, Nicola J Hodges1
1School of Kinesiology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Abstract:
There is debate about how implicit and explicit processes interact in sensorimotor adaptation, implicating how error signals drive learning. Target error information is thought to primarily influence explicit processes, therefore manipulations to the veracity of this information should impact adaptation but not implicit recalibration (i.e. after-effects). Thirty participants across three groups initially adapted to rotated cursor feedback. Then we manipulated numeric target error through knowledge of results (KR) feedback, where groups practised with correct or incorrect (+/-15°) numeric KR. Participants adapted to erroneous KR, but only the KR + 15 group showed augmented implicit recalibration, evidenced by larger after-effects than before KR exposure. In the presence of sensory prediction errors, target errors modulated after-effects, suggesting an interaction between implicit and explicit processes.
Related Concept Videos
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Effects of feedback
Feedback significantly modifies the gain of a control system. The gain of a system without feedback is altered by a factor of one plus GH, where G represents...
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Hindsight Biases
Positive and Negative Feedback Loops
Regression Toward the Mean

