Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

5.7K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
5.7K
Overview of the Skull01:08

Overview of the Skull

4.8K
The cranium (skull) is the skeletal structure of the head that supports the face and protects the brain. It is subdivided into the facial bones and the brain case, or cranial vault. The facial bones underlie the facial structures, form the nasal cavity, enclose the eyeballs, and support the teeth of the upper and lower jaws.
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life-Course Patterns of Medical and Dental Care in Patients with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Nationwide Claims-Based Study.

The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association·2026
Same author

Mapping malignancy: Multicenter study addressing topographic challenges in biliary stricture artificial intelligence analysis.

Endoscopy international open·2026
Same author

Comparison between endoscopic lumbar discectomy with and without annulus fibrosus suturing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asian spine journal·2026
Same author

Accuracy and Efficiency of Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Using Three Different Registration Methods-A Laboratory Study.

Clinical oral implants research·2026
Same author

The rat as a model for biologic rotator cuff treatment interventions.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same author

Systematic Review of Bioactive Glass Cages in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

International journal of spine surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.8K

Classification of Maxillofacial Morphology by Artificial Intelligence Using Cephalometric Analysis Measurements.

Akane Ueda1,2, Cami Tussie3, Sophie Kim3

  • 1Division of Orthodontics, Department of Developmental Oral Health Science, School of Dentistry, Iwate Medical University, 1-3-27 Chuo-dori, Morioka 020-8505, Iwate, Japan.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model for classifying maxillofacial morphology using cephalometric analysis. The AI model achieved high accuracy, standardizing orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.

Keywords:
artificial intelligence (AI)cephalogramsk-foldmachine learningorthodonticsrandom forest classifier (RF)

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

376
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

890

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

2.8K
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

376
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

890

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cephalometric Analysis

Background:

  • Maxillofacial morphology is crucial for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
  • Sassouni's classification exists, but lacks standardization in patient assignment.
  • Accurate classification is needed to standardize treatment approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for accurate maxillofacial morphology classification.
  • To standardize the classification of maxillofacial morphology using cephalometric data.
  • To improve orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning through AI.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized cephalograms from 220 adult patients (≥18 years).
  • Employed a random forest classifier with eight cephalometric measurements and gender as input features.
  • Trained and tested models using k-fold cross-validation for horizontal, vertical, and combined classifications.

Main Results:

  • Achieved high classification accuracies: 0.823 for combined, 0.986 for anteroposterior, and 0.850 for vertical.
  • The ANB angle was identified as the most important feature (0.3519).
  • The AI model demonstrated robust performance in classifying maxillofacial morphology.

Conclusions:

  • The developed AI model accurately classifies maxillofacial morphology.
  • This AI approach offers a standardized method for classification in orthodontics.
  • Further improvements are possible with increased data for the AI model.