Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

MR Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer with a Small Molecular CLT1 Peptide Targeted Contrast Agent
Published on: September 3, 2013
'Stealth' Prostate Tumors.
Vinayak G Wagaskar1, Osama Zaytoun1,2, Swati Bhardwaj3
1Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and systematic prostate biopsy (PBx) have significant false negative rates for prostate cancer (PCa) detection. Improved diagnostic strategies are needed to enhance accuracy and tumor localization.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Oncology
- Radiology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis relies on prebiopsy imaging and biopsies.
- False negative results can lead to delayed or missed diagnoses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the false negative rates of prebiopsy MRI and MRI-ultrasound (US) guided 12-core systematic prostate biopsy (PBx).
- To analyze radical prostatectomy specimens to assess diagnostic accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 3600 prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
- Patients were categorized based on biopsy and MRI findings: contralateral benign PBx, non-suspicious mpMRI, or both.
- Evaluated for PCa, clinically significant PCa (csPCa), extracapsular extension (ECE), and positive surgical margins (PSM).
Main Results:
- PCa detection rates varied across subgroups (19.5%–37.7%), with csPCa rates ranging from 10.3%–16.3%.
- Contralateral pT3 disease and positive surgical margins were observed in 4-7% of cases across subgroups.
Conclusions:
- Standard diagnostic methods for PCa exhibit significant false negative rates.
- Further strategies are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy and precise tumor localization.
More Related Videos
07:25A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
06:08A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025