Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interhemispheric interference during word naming.

J Liederman

    The International Journal of Neuroscience
    |August 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Presenting information to both brain hemispheres simultaneously does not improve recall or recognition. Dividing visual input between hemispheres did not reduce interference or enhance performance compared to single-hemisphere presentation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Male prevalence for reading disability is found in a large sample of black and white children free from ascertainment bias.

    Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2000
    Same author

    Presentation of words to separate hemispheres prevents interword illusory conjunctions.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2000
    Same author

    The dynamics of interhemispheric collaboration and hemispheric control.

    Brain and cognition·1998
    Same author

    Division of inputs between hemispheres eliminates illusory conjunctions.

    Neuropsychologia·1996
    Same author

    A re-examination of the sex ratios of families with a neurodevelopmentally disordered child.

    Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·1996
    Same author

    Effectiveness of individualized developmental care for low-risk preterm infants: behavioral and electrophysiologic evidence.

    Pediatrics·1995
    Same journal

    Thoracic paravertebral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing minimally invasive vertebroplasty: effects on pain and lumbar function.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    Same journal

    Recurrence associated IGFBP2 promotes malignant progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in glioma cells via the AKT mTOR pathway.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    Same journal

    Decreased miR-1305 expression is associated with tumour invasiveness and poor prognosis in glioma patients.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    Same journal

    Astaxanthin alleviates ischemia-reperfusion injury by regulating the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical efficacy of cryopreserved autologous bone flaps versus titanium plates for cranioplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    Same journal

    Sericin improves diabetic cognitive impairment in rats by inhibiting TXNIP/NLRP3 neuroinflammation through SIRT1.

    The International journal of neuroscience·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Visual Perception
    • Hemispheric Specialization

    Background:

    • The brain's two hemispheres process information, and presenting stimuli to both may reduce interference.
    • Previous research suggests potential benefits of bihemispheric processing for cognitive tasks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To test the hypothesis that bihemispheric presentation of visual information improves performance by reducing interference.
    • To compare performance between unilateral-single hemisphere and bilateral-bihemispheric visual input.

    Main Methods:

    • Subjects identified simultaneously presented words under unilateral (single hemisphere) and bilateral (bihemispheric) visual field conditions.
    • Experiments involved tasks requiring naming (Experiments I & II) and recognition (Experiment III) of visual stimuli.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Interference and performance were measured by accuracy and error rates, including incorrect blending of words.

    • Main Results:

    • Words presented to different hemispheres were blended into single responses as frequently as words presented to one hemisphere.
    • Performance did not exceed that of the better unilateral presentation, even when irrelevant stimuli were present.
    • Bihemispheric presentation did not improve naming or recognition performance over unilateral presentation.

    Conclusions:

    • Dividing visual input between the two hemispheres does not consistently improve performance or reduce interference.
    • The hypothesis that bihemispheric presentation inherently enhances cognitive performance was not supported.
    • Hemispheric specialization may limit the benefits of simultaneous bihemispheric information processing.