Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smartphone-Based Pupillometry for Noninvasive Detection of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Nepali Acute Brain Injury Patients: A Pilot Study.

Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Renaming Twiddler's syndrome: an argument for change to reflect a diverse set of aetiologies, patients and devices.

BMJ case reports·2025
Same author

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Patients With Intraoperative Aneurysm Rupture: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Nepal.

Neurosurgery practice·2025
Same author

Applications and potential of machine, learning augmented chest X-ray interpretation in cardiology.

Minerva cardiology and angiology·2024
Same author

Focusing a Bioethics Lens on the Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Neurosurgery.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology·2024
Same author

Deep Brain Stimulation for Primary Refractory Tinnitus: A Systematic Review.

Brain sciences·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

850

Predicting Acoustic Hearing Preservation Following Cochlear Implant Surgery Using Machine Learning.

Daniel M Zeitler1,2, Quinlan D Buchlak3,4, Savindi Ramasundara3

  • 1Neuroscience Institute, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.

The Laryngoscope
|July 14, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models can predict acoustic hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CI). These models identify factors influencing hearing outcomes, aiding clinical decisions and improving patient results.

Keywords:
artificial intelligencecochlear implantmachine learningpredictive value of testssensorineural hearing loss

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

423

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

850
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

423

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology and Biomedical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Predictive Analytics in Medicine

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation (CI) is a common treatment for severe to profound hearing loss.
  • Predicting acoustic hearing preservation post-CI is crucial for patient counseling and surgical planning.
  • Current methods for predicting hearing outcomes are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate supervised machine-learning classifiers for predicting acoustic hearing preservation after CI.
  • To identify preoperative clinical factors associated with hearing preservation.
  • To enhance shared clinical decision-making for CI patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected CI dataset (n=175 patients).
  • Supervised machine learning classifiers were trained and tested using preoperative clinical data.
  • Audiometric testing (standard pure tone average, SPTA; low-frequency PTA, LFPTA) was performed preoperatively and one month post-surgery.
  • Model performance was evaluated using metrics like AUC and MCC.

Main Results:

  • Machine learning models successfully predicted acoustic hearing preservation.
  • Factors like meningitis history, preoperative hearing levels, sudden hearing loss, noise exposure, and anatomy were associated with hearing preservation.
  • Random forest models showed the highest classification performance.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning is a valuable tool for predicting residual acoustic hearing in CI patients.
  • Identified associations aid in interpreting model predictions and understanding factors influencing hearing preservation.
  • These models and findings can improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.