Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025
Precision Measurements and Parametric Models of Vertebral Endplates
Published on: September 17, 2019
Thoracolumbar Vertebral Endplate Defect Morphology: A Descriptive Study of Human Cadaveric Spines Using
James Faul1, Joseph Umoh2, David W Holdsworth2,3
1Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Study Design:
A descriptive, cross-sectional cadaver study.
Objective:
This study aimed to provide a thorough depiction of vertebral endplate defects classified based on their morphologic features and reported with respect to size, location, and prevalence in the human cadaveric spines of older adults.
Summary Of Background Data:
Back pain has been associated with vertebral endplate defects; however, findings have been inconsistent. This is partially due to miscommunication surrounding the classification of endplate defects observed using clinical imaging, and limited knowledge of the types of defects present on the endplate and their prevalence. A comprehensive study of vertebral endplates is needed to clarify types of structural defects, their character, and prevalence.
Materials And Methods:
Using micro-computed tomography, 3-dimensional reconstructed images were created of 409 endplates from 19 cadaveric spines (9 men and 10 women; aged 62-91; T6-S1). Endplate defects were categorized based on their morphology, size, and location to investigate distribution patterns.
Results:
Seven types of endplate defects were identified: Schmorl nodes, corner fracture or limbus vertebra, other fractures, erosion, jagged surface, calcification, and depressions. Defects were identified on 63.6% of endplates. Multiple defects were present on 19.1% of endplates. Fracture and erosion were the most common defect types. Defects were more common on the endplate cranial to the intervertebral disc and in male specimens ( P = 0.01). Defects were larger in the lumbar spine and the "total area of endplate defect" was larger on the cranial than the caudal endplate in the thoracic spine ( P < 0.05).
Conclusion:
This is the first study of which we are aware that provides a thorough depiction of the morphology and distribution of endplate defects across the entire lower thoracic and lumbar spine (T6-S1) using micro-computed tomography. Results support the presence of several distinct endplate defect phenotypes with different prevalence rates and provide a reference when considering endplate defects in the elderly.
