Implementation and evaluation of different techniques to modify DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability...

Groundwater vulnerability assessment has nowadays evolved into an essential tool towards proper groundwater protection and management, while the DRASTIC method is included among the most widely applied vulnerability assessment methods. However, the high uncertainty of the DRASTIC method mainly associated with the subjectivity in assigning parameters ratings and weights has driven many researchers to apply various methods for improving its efficiency. In this context, in the present study, different techniques were implemented with the aim of modifying the DRASTIC framework and thus enhancing its performance for groundwater vulnerability assessment in the Bouficha aquifer, Tunisia. In a first stage, the land use type (L) was incorporated as an additional parameter in the typical DRASTIC framework, thus taking into consideration the impact of anthropogenic activities on groundwater vulnerability. Subsequently, the rating and weighting systems of the developed DRASTIC-L framework were modified through the application of statistical methods (DRASTIC-L-SA) and genetic algorithms (GA) (DRASTIC-L-GA) in an attempt to investigate and compare both linear and nonlinear modifications. To evaluate the various vulnerability frameworks, correlation between vulnerability values and nitrate concentrations, expressed as Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ) and Correlation Index (CI), was examined. The results revealed that the DRASTIC-L-GA framework developed by applying a fully GA-based optimization procedure provided the highest values in terms of the performance metrics used, making it the most suitable for the study area. In addition, the aquifer under study was found to be less vulnerable to pollution when employing the typical DRASTIC framework instead of the modified ones, leading to the conclusion that the former substantially underestimates pollution potential in the study area.