Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Three Developmental Domains01:29

Three Developmental Domains

185
Human development is typically examined across three main domains: physical, cognitive, and socio-emotional. These domains represent the significant areas of change and continuity throughout the lifespan, from infancy to late adulthood.
Physical Development
Physical processes, also known as maturation, encompass the biological changes that occur across an individual's life. These changes begin with genetic inheritance and continue through various stages, including growth in height and...
185
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

8.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.7K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

11.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.4K
Introduction to Developmental Psychology01:27

Introduction to Developmental Psychology

301
Developmental psychology explores the changes and continuities in human abilities throughout life, encompassing physical, cognitive, linguistic, and social dimensions. Human development is not restricted to growth, but includes aspects of decline, particularly in physical abilities as individuals age. Developmental psychologists seek to understand how people change as they age and how their mental and social skills evolve.
Developmental Milestones
A key concept in developmental psychology is...
301
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Building an evidence base on organisational interventions to advance women in healthcare leadership.

EClinicalMedicine·2021
Same author

Acknowledging complexity in evaluation of gender equality interventions.

EClinicalMedicine·2020
Same author

Link Horizon Europe funding to real steps to gender equality.

Nature·2020
Same author

Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective.

Health research policy and systems·2020
Same author

Women Underrepresentation in R&I: A Sector Program Assessment of the Contribution of Gender Equality Policies in Research and Innovation.

Evaluation and program planning·2019
Same author

Developing a conceptual evaluation framework for gender equality interventions in research and innovation.

Evaluation and program planning·2019
Same journal

Terms of whose reference? Commissioning, power, and the distribution of evaluative learning in development.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Proposing an identity-in-context framework for culturally responsive evaluation.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

The Participatory Institutional Capacity Assessment and Learning (PICAL) index, its adaptation in the democratic republic of the congo, and lessons learned.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Decolonizing evaluation education in South Africa: A reflective case study of master's curriculum reform through a Made-in-Africa evaluation lens.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Program evaluation plan assessing African American male achievement at predominantly white institutions: New Jersey education opportunity fund.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular screening in homeless outreach: An operationally-ethical protocol.

Evaluation and program planning·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K

Creating a developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organisations.

Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt1

  • 1Aarhus University, Department of Political Science, Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Bartholins Allé 7, DK - 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Evaluation and Program Planning
|July 15, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a framework for evaluating Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) implementation in research organizations. It focuses on achieving structural change through tailored plans, using bioscience examples.

Keywords:
BiosciencesComplexityDevelopmental evaluationEvaluation frameworkRRIResearch organisationsStructural change

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.3K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
09:16

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Science and Technology Studies
  • Research Ethics
  • Innovation Management

Background:

  • Evaluating Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) implementation poses challenges for stakeholders like policymakers and researchers.
  • Existing literature on RRI responsibility and practice needs more focus on monitoring and evaluation, especially regarding structural change effects in research organizations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss a contextualized developmental framework for evaluating RRI implementation in research organizations.
  • To focus on achieving structural change through tailor-made action plans within RRI initiatives.
  • To provide a framework applicable to RRI design, implementation, and evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a systemic and process-oriented framework through RRI evaluation in biosciences.
  • Incorporated participatory, anticipatory, reflexive, and responsive dimensions.
  • Utilized empirical examples from bioscience organizations to illustrate framework application.

Main Results:

  • The framework demonstrates how conceptual insights emerge from real-life practices and data analysis.
  • Provided concrete examples from bioscience organizations showing framework relevance to specific conditions and solutions.
  • Highlighted the framework's potential for broader applicability beyond initial customization.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework offers a structured approach to evaluating RRI implementation and its structural change effects.
  • The framework's systemic and process-oriented perspective, with its key dimensions, is valuable for research organizations.
  • Despite initial customization for biosciences, the framework has potential for wider use in addressing RRI challenges.