Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2025
Surgical Retrieval, Isolation and In vitro Expansion of Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament-derived Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications
Published on: April 30, 2014
Effect of Tibiofemoral Rotation Angle on Graft Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Chilan Bou Ghosson Leite1, Gergo Merkely1, Evan M Farina1
1Center for Cartilage Repair and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Background:
Coronal and sagittal malalignment of the knee are well-recognized risk factors for failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). However, the effect of axial malalignment on graft survival after ACLR is yet to be determined.
Purpose:
To evaluate whether increased tibiofemoral rotational malalignment, namely, tibiofemoral rotation angle (TFA) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, is associated with graft failure after ACLR.
Study Design:
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
Methods:
In this retrospective matched control study of a single center's database, 151 patients who underwent revision ACLR because of graft failure (ACLR failure group, defined as symptomatic patients with anterior knee instability and an ACL graft tear appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and confirmed during arthroscopic surgery) were compared with a matched control group of 151 patients who underwent primary ACLR with no evidence of failure after ≥2-year follow-up (intact ACLR group). Patients were matched by sex, age, and meniscal injury during primary ACLR. Axial malalignment was assessed on preoperative MRI through the TFA and the TT-TG distance. Sagittal alignment was measured through the posterior tibial slope on MRI. The optimal TFA cutoff associated with graft failure was identified by a receiver operating characteristic curve. The Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of the TFA on ACLR longevity.
Results:
The mean age was 25.7 ± 10.4 years for the ACLR failure group and 25.9 ± 10.0 years for the intact ACLR group. Among all the included patients, 174 (57.6%) were male. In the ACLR failure group, the mean TFA was 5.8°± 4.5° (range, -5° to 16°), while it was 3.0°± 3.3° (range, -3° to 15°) in the intact ACLR group (P < .001). Neither the TT-TG distance nor the posterior tibial slope presented statistical differences between the groups. The receiver operating characteristic curve suggested an optimal TFA cutoff of 4.5° for graft failure (area under the curve = 0.71; P < .001; sensitivity, 68.2%; specificity, 75.5%). Considering this a threshold, patients who had a TFA ≥4.5° had 6.6 times higher odds of graft failure compared with patients with a TFA <4.5° (P < .001). Survival analysis demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 81% in patients with a TFA <4.5°, while it was 44% in those with a TFA ≥4.5° (P < .001).
Conclusion:
An increased TFA was associated with increased odds of ACLR failure when the TFA was ≥4.5°. Measuring the TFA in patients with ACL tears undergoing reconstruction may inform the surgeon about additional factors that may require consideration before ACLR for a successful outcome.
