Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations01:15

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations

438
Optimizing chromatographic separations is crucial for obtaining clean separations in a minimum amount of time. Optimization is required for several factors, including kinetic effects related to band broadening, plate height, capacity factor, and separation factor.
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
438
Principles Of Column Chromatography01:13

Principles Of Column Chromatography

6.9K
The chromatography technique was first invented in 1901 by Michael S. Tswett, a Russian botanist, to separate plant pigments using organic solvents. Further, in 1941, Archer John Porter Martin and R. L. M. Synge modified the technique by packing silica gel into a column. A mixture of amino acids was then separated on the packed column using chloroform and water mixture as the mobile phase. This was the first report on column chromatography. At present, column chromatography is a widely used...
6.9K
Types Of Column Chromatography01:29

Types Of Column Chromatography

11.3K
The stability and compatibility of column material with samples are crucial for efficient purification in chromatographic techniques. Various operating parameters such as pH, temperature, or solvent affect the packing of the column material, thereby determining the purification efficiency. The choice of column material also plays an essential role in deciding the operating parameters and can be modified based on the proteins that need to be purified.
Gel Filtration Chromatography
When the...
11.3K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Instrumentation00:57

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Instrumentation

1.9K
High-performance liquid chromatography, or HPLC, is an analytical technique that separates liquid samples under high pressures. An HPLC instrument consists of glass bottles for storing solvents called mobile phase reservoirs. HPLC-grade solvents are used to maintain high purity, and the dissolved gases are removed using a degasser, such as a vacuum pumping system or sparging with helium. The solvents are then pumped into the analytical column using a screw-driven syringe or reciprocating pumps.
1.9K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction01:11

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction

2.1K
High-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC), formerly referred to as High-pressure liquid chromatography, is a powerful technique used to separate, identify, and quantify components in complex mixtures. The term "high pressure" refers to using high pressure to push the liquid mobile phase through the tightly packed columns.
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:
2.1K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process01:05

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Elution Process

540
In High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), the elution process is critical to the separation of analytes and the quality of chromatographic results. Elution describes how compounds move through the column and separate based on their interactions with the mobile and stationary phases. This process determines the resolution, peak shape, and retention times in the chromatogram, which are essential for identifying and quantifying components in complex mixtures. Understanding the elution...
540

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active tumor targeting by core-shell PDMS-HA nanoparticles with sequential delivery of doxorubicin and quercetin to overcome P-glycoprotein efflux pump.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Implementation of machine learning tool for continued process verification of process chromatography unit operation.

Journal of chromatography. A·2025
Same author

Electrospun Mesoporous Ni<sub>0.5</sub>Zn<sub>0.5</sub>Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> - CNT - Hollow Carbon Ternary Composite Nanofibers as High Performance Electrodes for Advanced Symmetric Supercapacitors.

Chemistry, an Asian journal·2024
Same author

Chiral nanomaterial-based approaches for diagnosis and treatment of protein-aggregated neurodiseases: current status and future opportunities.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2024
Same author

Tetragonal-zircon BiVO<sub>4</sub>: a better polymorph for the formation of coherent type-II heterostructures for water splitting applications.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2023
Same author

Advances in bioreactor control for production of biotherapeutic products.

Biotechnology and bioengineering·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity
06:44

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity

Published on: June 12, 2016

6.6K

Comparison of multi-column chromatography configurations through model-based optimization.

Aditya Pareek1, Venkata Sudheendra Buddhiraju1, Vishnu Swaroopji Masampally1

  • 1TCS Research, Tata Research Development and Design Centre, Tata Consultancy Services, Pune, India.

Biotechnology Progress
|July 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Model-based optimization shows that 3-column periodic counter-current chromatography (PCC) offers higher yield and productivity for monoclonal antibody (mAb) purification. However, 4-column PCC provides consistent performance under wash volume constraints.

Keywords:
continuous bioprocessingglobal optimizationmodel-based optimizationmonoclonal antibodymulti-column chromatography

More Related Videos

Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification
10:21

Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification

Published on: September 21, 2011

43.8K
Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection
08:01

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection

Published on: December 15, 2015

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 23, 2025

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity
06:44

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity

Published on: June 12, 2016

6.6K
Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification
10:21

Automated Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Column Selection for Use in Protein Purification

Published on: September 21, 2011

43.8K
Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection
08:01

Tuning a Parallel Segmented Flow Column and Enabling Multiplexed Detection

Published on: December 15, 2015

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biopharmaceutical Manufacturing
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Process Optimization

Background:

  • Integrated continuous bioprocessing is the future of biopharmaceutical manufacturing.
  • Multi-column chromatography enhances productivity and capacity utilization for biomolecule capture.
  • Periodic counter-current chromatography (PCC) is a key technology for continuous processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To optimize two prevalent multi-column PCC designs (3-column and 4-column).
  • To evaluate performance based on monoclonal antibody (mAb) feed concentration and operational protocols.
  • To identify optimal configurations for yield, productivity, and capacity utilization.

Main Methods:

  • Model-based optimization using Radial basis function technique.
  • Analysis of 3-column and 4-column PCC configurations.
  • Varying mAb feed concentrations, cleaning-in-place (CIP), and equilibration durations.
  • Decision variables included superficial velocities and stage durations.

Main Results:

  • Without wash volume constraints, 3-column PCC outperformed 4-column PCC in productivity, yield, and capacity utilization.
  • At 1.2 mg/mL mAb feed, 3-column PCC achieved 0.024 mg/mL.s productivity, 0.94 yield, and 0.94 capacity utilization.
  • With wash volume constraints, 4-column PCC demonstrated consistent productivity and yield, albeit with lower capacity utilization.

Conclusions:

  • 3-column PCC is superior for maximizing yield and productivity in mAb purification when wash volumes are not limited.
  • 4-column PCC offers robustness and consistent performance under stricter operational constraints, making it suitable for specific manufacturing scenarios.