Emphasis spread: The domain and trigger
Aziz Jaber1, Osama Omari2, Rasheed Al-Jarrah3
1Department of English Language & Literature, Yarmouk University, 303 Village Building, Irbid, 21163, Jordan.
Heliyon
|July 17, 2023
Summary
Emphasis spread in Urban Jordanian Arabic primarily affects preceding morphemes (prefixes) more than succeeding ones (suffixes). This study reveals asymmetric morpheme boundary effects on emphasis, suggesting distinct boundary strengths.
Area of Science:
- Phonetics and Phonology
- Linguistic Phonetics
- Sociolinguistics
Background:
- Emphasis spread is a known phenomenon in Arabic dialects, influencing adjacent sounds.
- Previous research suggested morphemes can confound emphasis spread, but the extent and directionality were unclear.
- Urban Jordanian Arabic exhibits unique phonological features requiring specific investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the domain and directionality of emphasis spread in Urban Jordanian Arabic.
- To examine the acoustic coarticulatory effects of emphasis on surrounding vowels.
- To determine if morpheme boundaries influence emphasis spread differently based on direction (prefix vs. suffix).
Main Methods:
- Recording nine native speakers of Urban Jordanian Arabic reading minimal pairs.
- Minimal pairs featured the emphatic fricative /sˁ/ and its plain counterpart /s/ in initial and final positions.
- Acoustic analysis of F1, F2, and F3 in vowels adjacent to the emphatic/plain fricatives.
Main Results:
- Emphasis spread was confirmed, with morphemes acting as a confounding factor, albeit disproportionately.
- Emphasis demonstrably spread to preceding morphemes (prefixes).
- Emphasis spread to succeeding morphemes (suffixes) was less evident, indicating a more robust stem-suffix boundary.
Conclusions:
- The morpheme boundary's strength varies, with the stem-suffix boundary being more resistant to emphasis spread than the stem-prefix boundary.
- A distinction in boundary strength between prefix and suffix boundaries is hypothesized.
- Findings contribute to understanding prosodic domain and directionality in Arabic phonology.
Related Concept Videos
Spreading of Chromatin Modifications
8.3K
The histone proteins in the nucleosomes are post-translationally modified (PTM) to increase or decrease access to DNA. The commonly observed PTMs are methylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination of lysine amino acids in the histone H3 tail region. These histone modifications have specific meaning for the cell. Hence, they are called "histone code". The protein complex involved in histone modification is termed as "reader-writer" complex.
Writers
The writer...
Writers
The writer...
8.3K
tRNA Activation
6.8K
6.8K
Spare Receptors
3.6K
Some receptors remain unoccupied even when an agonist produces a maximal response. Such empty ones are called spare receptors. In presence of spare receptors the maximum effect of an agonist drug is achieved with fewer than 100% of the receptors being occupied. To determine the presence of spare receptors, scientists often compare the concentration of the drug needed to produce 50% of the maximum effect (EC50) with the concentration of the drug needed to occupy 50% of the receptors (Kd). If the...
3.6K
Master Transcription Regulators
2.3K
2.3K
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade
8.5K
When a ligand binds to a cell-surface receptor, the receptor's intracellular domain changes shape, which may either activate its enzyme function or allow its binding to other molecules. The initial signal is amplified by most signal transduction pathways. This means that a single ligand molecule can activate multiple molecules of a downstream target. Proteins that relay a signal are most commonly phosphorylated at one or more sites, activating or inactivating the protein. Kinases catalyze...
8.5K
Regulation of Expression Occurs at Multiple Steps
3.1K
3.1K


