Comparison of Effectiveness of Hiora SG Gel With Triamcinolone Acetonide Gel in Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis

Background The oral condition known as recurrent aphthous ulceration (RAU) or recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is very prevalent. Its etiopathogenesis is unknown; hence, symptomatic therapy is all that can be offered if it manifests clinically. Lesion care aims to minimize discomfort and the frequency of relapses by bringing active illness under local control in the affected area. The current treatment options that may have negative side effects include the use of topical and systemic steroids, antibiotics, cauterization, and laser therapy. Objectives and Importance This study aimed to compare the efficiency of HiOra SG gel with triamcinolone acetonide gel in the management of RAS. Materials and Methods Fifty individuals with RAS were recruited for the trial and randomly assigned to either group I (HiOra SG gel) or group II (0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment; Oraways). After each meal for a total of 10 days, those with mouth ulcers were instructed to topically administer the drugs. The clinical data were analyzed by comparing the ulcer severity scores from the first, fifth, and 10th days. Results There was a statistically significant (p = 0.001) reduction in reported pain, pain duration, and overall ulcer severity across all groups. After therapy, however, neither the HiOra gel group nor the triamcinolone group showed any discernible improvement over the other. Conclusion The present study's findings corroborate the efficacy of HiOra SG gel in the treatment of RAS when compared to triamcinolone acetonide gel (0.1%). In this trial, no patients had any negative reactions to HiOra SG gel. In the future, further studies are needed with larger samples to prove its benefits.